Odinga v. IEBC
Document contents
from other jurisdictions, notably
Australia; New Zealand; Canada; the United Kingdom; Ireland; the
Netherlands; India and South Africa, also makes a clear distinction between
Judgment
August v Electoral Commission of South Africa
Document contents
Kingdom and Japan all persons
serving sentences are excluded, while in Denmark, Ireland, Israel, Sweden and Switzerland, all prisoners can
vote.
31
SACHS J
legislation31
Judgment
Quinn Leandro v. Jonas
Document contents
section 64 of “An Act for the Regulation of Municipal
Corporations in Ireland” governed the hours of voting in elections.59 It stated,
among other things
Judgment
Baker v. Carr
Document contents
administrative agencies
(Boundary Commissions for England, Scotland, Wales
and Northern Ireland, respectively)." The Commissions, having regard to certain rules prescribed for
Judgment
Bangladesh 16th amendment ruling
Document contents
legislatures
in
Parliament),
Northern
Scotland
Wales
(Wales
Ireland
(Scottish
Assembly)
(Northern
and
Ireland
Assembly): All three bodies can pass primary
legislation
Judgment
Attorney General v. Taylor
Document contents
of paying compensation: European Convention on Human
Rights Act 2003 (Republic of Ireland), s 5.
Taylor (CA), above n 4, at [66].
Mandic v Cornwall Park
Judgment
Gandhi v. Narain
Document contents
Speaker by a letter
from the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland which was read to the
House by the Speaker. The detention of a Member
Judgment
Chester v. Secretary of State for Justice
Document contents
apart);
(c) is either a Commonwealth citizen or a citizen of the Republic of
Ireland; and
(d) is of voting age (that is, 18 years or over)….”
Page 4
Section
Judgment
Caamaño Valle v. Spain
Document contents
The Member States are Belgium,
Bulgaria, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Slovakia. This exclusion
Judgment
Strøbye & Rosenlind v. Denmark
Document contents
The Member States are Belgium,
Bulgaria, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Lithuania,
22
STRØBYE AND ROSENLIND v. DENMARK JUDGMENT
Luxembourg, Malta, Poland
Judgment
Molka v. Poland
Document contents
12
MÓŁKA v. POLAND DECISION
the status of local authorities in Northern Ireland, the Commission observed
that “insofar as these local authorities have a legislative
Judgment
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Document contents
Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America. For the
texts of the said declarations, see No.
- Preview
Resources
Tanase v. Moldova
Document contents
13378/05, §§ 33 and 34, ECHR 2008; Open Door and
Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland, 29 October 1992, § 44, Series A no. 246-A;
and Klass and Others,
- Preview
Resources
Zdanoka v. Latvia
Document contents
rights
from persons convicted of serious or financial crimes (see Holland v.
Ireland, no. 24827/94, Commission decision of 14 April 1998, DR 93-A,
p. 15,
- Preview
Resources
Labita v. Italy
Document contents
concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted
presumptions of fact (see the Ireland v. the United Kingdom judgment of
18 January 1978, Series A no. 25,
- Preview
Resources
Iskra v. Russia
Document contents
immediate and powerful effect
than print media (see Purcell and Others v. Ireland, no. 15404/89,
Commission decision of 16 April 1991, Decisions and Reports
- Preview
Resources
Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook
Document contents
court as EDRB
Article 35 of the Constitution of the Republic of Ireland:
‘All judges shall be independent in the exercise of their judicial
- Preview
Resources
Measuring Effective Remedies for Fraud and Administrative Malpractice
Document contents
has already
occurred a remedy should still be provided. In McFarlane v Ireland the Court held that Article 13
allows a State to choose between a
- Preview
Resources
Yumak & Sadak v. Turkey
Document contents
in Europe.
By way of example, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Norway, Poland, Portugal,
Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden
- Preview
Resources
Equal Access: How to Include Persons with Disabilities in Elections and Political Processes
Document contents
Guatemala43
Good Practice
Down Syndrome Ireland
launched the My Opinion, My
Vote project in six countries –
Ireland, Italy, Malta, Hungary,
Spain and Denmark
- Preview
Resources
Sitaropoulos v. Greece
Document contents
is permitted in several established democracies in western
Europe, e.g. Germany, Ireland, Spain, Switzerland ... It was also used, for example, in
Bosnia and
- Preview
Resources
In re Magyar Ketfarku Kutya Part v. Hungary
Document contents
these
conditions are satisfied (see, among many other authorities, McFarlane
v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010; Vučković and
Others v. Serbia
- Preview
Resources
Communist Party of Russia v. Russia
Document contents
restrictions on reporting on a particular political movement (Purcell
and Others v. Ireland, no. 15404/89, 16 April 1991), or impossibility for
nationals living abroad
- Preview
Resources
Incal v. Turkey
Document contents
problems linked to the prevention of
terrorism (see, among other authorities, the Ireland v. the United Kingdom
judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25,
- Preview
Resources
Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors, and Lawyers
Document contents
activities in
Northern Ireland by the IRA and various associated groups, operating from the
territory of the Republic of Ireland”.67
Seventeen years later
- Preview
Resources
Election Dispute Resolution Report 2020
Document contents
Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy,
Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Montenegro, the Netherlands, North
- Preview
Resources
28 shown of 28 entities