Search Tips
sorted by
4 shown of 4 entities
Caamaño Valle v. Spain
Document contents
Europe (the only two States that are not
party to the CRPD are Liechtenstein and Ukraine). It is true that a number
of these 45 States have
- Question Presented
- Whether the rescission of voting rights for disabled person under guardianship based on individualized assessment is legal under Article 3, Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Country
- Spain
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Aug 11, 2021
Judgment
Strøbye & Rosenlind v. Denmark
Document contents
close links to, or a stake in, the country concerned (see Hilbe v. Liechtenstein (dec.),
no. 31981/96, ECHR 1999-VI, and Melnychenko v. Ukraine, no. 17707/02,
- Question Presented
- Whether the automatic removal of persons contravened Article 3, Protocol No. 1 of European Convention on Human Rights and, consequently, constituted illegal discrimination under Article 14 under the same Convention.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Voters' Rights
- Country
- Denmark
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Feb 2, 2021
Judgment
Chester v. Secretary of State for Justice
Document contents
no restrictions on voting by
prisoners. Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Japan, Liechtenstein, Russia and
the United States ban all convicted prisoners from voting, as
- Legal Issue(s)
- Judicial Independence
- Voter Registration
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Oct 16, 2013
Judgment
Alajos Kiss v. Hungary
Document contents
close links to, or a stake in, the country concerned (see Hilbe v. Liechtenstein (dec.),
no. 31981/96, ECHR 1999-VI, and Melnychenko v. Ukraine, no. 17707/02,
- Question Presented
- Whether Hungary's voting restriction was proportional and legitimate under Article 1, Protocol 3
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Elections as a Fundamental Right
- Voters' Rights
- Country
- Hungary
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- May 20, 2010
Judgment
4 shown of 4 entities