Search Tips
sorted by
12 shown of 12 entities
Caamaño Valle v. Spain
Document contents
40-41; footnotes
omitted):
“Seven out of the 28 EU Member States – Austria, Croatia, Italy, Latvia, the
Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom – guarantee
- Question Presented
- Whether the rescission of voting rights for disabled person under guardianship based on individualized assessment is legal under Article 3, Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Region
- Europe and Eurasia
- Country
- Spain
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Aug 11, 2021
Judgment
Strøbye & Rosenlind v. Denmark
Document contents
things (pages
40-41):
“Seven out of the 28 EU Member States – Austria, Croatia, Italy, Latvia, the
Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom – guarantee
- Question Presented
- Whether the automatic removal of persons contravened Article 3, Protocol No. 1 of European Convention on Human Rights and, consequently, constituted illegal discrimination under Article 14 under the same Convention.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Voters' Rights
- Region
- Europe and Eurasia
- Country
- Denmark
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Feb 2, 2021
Judgment
Molka v. Poland
Document contents
embrace
aspects of an individual’s physical and social identity (see Mikulić
v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 53, ECHR 2002-I). Article 8 also protects a right
to
- Question Presented
- Did Poland violate the European Charter of Human Rights by being indifferent to the inaccessibility of poll stations?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Region
- Europe and Eurasia
- Country
- Poland
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Apr 11, 2006
Judgment
Călin Georgescu v. Romania
Document contents
light of the legal
arguments adduced and vice versa (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia
[GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 110, 20 March 2018).
34. The Court notes
- Question Presented
- Did the Constitutional Court of Romania err in annulling the first round of elections or infringe upon Georgescu's right to a free election?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Electoral Integrity
- Improper Practices
- Social Media
- Technology
- Region
- Europe and Eurasia
- Country
- Romania
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Mar 6, 2025
Judgment
Tanase v. Moldova
Document contents
of the former Yugoslavia, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and
“the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” allow dual citizenship,
although Croatia and Slovenia seek to exclude
- Preview

- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Election Accessibility
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Violation of an International Treaty
- Language
- English
- Region
- Item does not have this property
Resources
Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook
Document contents
EDRS when it comes to challenges
to election results. These include Bulgaria, Croatia, Moldova, Montenegro,
Romania and Slovenia, as well as Armenia, the Czech Republic
- Preview

- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Election Dispute Resolution
- Language
- English
- Region
- Item does not have this property
Resources
Campos v. Ecuador
Document contents
the case of Olujic v. Croatia concerning the processing of a disciplinary
proceeding against the President of the Supreme Court of Croatia, the European Court
- Preview

- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Judicial Independence
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Language
- English
- Region
- Item does not have this property
Resources
Sitaropoulos v. Greece
Document contents
States fall into this category: Austria, Belgium,
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark,
Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary,
- Preview

- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Election Accessibility
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Language
- English
- Region
- Item does not have this property
Resources
In re Magyar Ketfarku Kutya Part v. Hungary
Document contents
voters from
influence over individuals’ electoral decisions.
45. In three countries (Croatia, France and the United Kingdom) the
electoral bodies have adopted instructions
- Preview

- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Legal Frameworks
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Language
- English
- French
- Region
- Item does not have this property
Resources
Grosaru v. Romania
Document contents
Of the States which replied to the
Commission’s questionnaire, only three (Croatia, Romania and Slovenia)
provided for the election of deputies intended to represent
- Preview

- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Violation of an International Treaty
- Language
- English
- Region
- Item does not have this property
Resources
Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors, and Lawyers
Document contents
Committee on the Rights of the Child expressed
concern with regard to Croatia that “children might be removed from their families
because of their
- Preview

- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Election Dispute Resolution
- Language
- English
- Portuguese
- Region
- Item does not have this property
Resources
Election Dispute Resolution Report 2020
Document contents
20 Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus,
Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary
- Preview

- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Election Dispute Resolution
- Legal Frameworks
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Language
- English
- Region
- Item does not have this property
Resources
12 shown of 12 entities