Kham v. Electoral Commission
Document contents
for
Sustainable Democracy), Elections Canada, INE (the National Electoral Institute of Mexico), IFES, The Carter
Center, UNDESA, UNDP and the UNEAD (United Nations Electoral
Judgment
Elections on Trial: The Effective Management of Election Disputes and Violations
Description
Drawing on comparative examples across six countries (Mexico, Tunisia, Kenya, Macedonia, Kosovo and the
- Preview
Resources
Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook
Document contents
presidential
elections as mandated by law
Mexico
2006
Electoral Court of the
Judicial Branch of the
Federation of Mexico
Recount of votes ordered in presidential
- Preview
Resources
When Are Elections Good Enough? Validating or Annulling Election Results
Document contents
Electoral Legislation of Mexico, Opinion No. 680 / 2012 CDL-AD(2013)021,
http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2013)021-e.
14
While judicial interlocutors in Mexico have told us
- Preview
Resources
Electoral Justice Regulations Around the World: Key findings from International IDEA's global research on electoral dispute-resolution systems
Document contents
Manuel González Oropeza
Justice of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary of Mexico
7
1. Introduction
Overview
Elections are central to establishing a legitimate democratic
- Preview
Resources
Measuring Effective Remedies for Fraud and Administrative Malpractice
Document contents
specifically, the right to register as an independent
candidate. Castañeda Gutman v. Mexico, Case 12.535, Rep. No. 113/06, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R. ¶¶ 92,40 (2008).
48
- Preview
Resources
Election Audits: International Principles that Protect Election Integrity
Document contents
spoiled ballot papers. 21
Some countries – including Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru – require complainants to attach supporting documentary evidence to
- Preview
Resources
Access to Justice and Electoral Integrity: A policy brief of the Electoral Integrity Initiative
Document contents
have facilitated democratic
development and strengthened electoral justice institutions in Mexico
are closely linked to the dialogue between national and international
instances.
- Preview
Resources
GUARDE: Directrices para la comprension y resolucion de conflictos electorales
Document contents
] y
parlamentarias de México 50 (2006) [en lo sucesivo, el informe de México],
http://aceproject.org/regionsen/countries-‐and-‐territories/MX/reports/mexico-‐presIdential-‐and-‐parliamentary-‐
- Preview
Resources
GUARDE: Guidelines for Understanding, Adjudicating, and Resolving Disputes in Elections
Document contents
Mission, Mexico PresIdential and Parliamentary Elections Final
Report 50 (2006) [hereinafter E.U. Mexico Report], available at http://aceproject.org/regionsen/countries-and-territories/MX/reports/mexico-presIden
- Preview
Resources
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Document contents
MAURITANIA:
POUR LA MAURITANIE:
3a
POR MAURITAMA:
FOR MEXICO:
POUR LE MEXIQUE:
S: PS If:
3a MeKCHicy:
POR MEXICO:
FOR MONACO:
POUR MONACO:
3a
POR MONACO:
- Preview
Resources
Tanganyika Law Society v. Tanzania
Document contents
the decision in the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights; Castañeda Gutman v Mexico,
Judgment of 6 August 2008 Series C No 184 to the effect that the
Judgment
Legal Considerations When Delaying or Adapting Elections
Document contents
Justice José Luis Vargas Valdez
Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary of Mexico
Founder of the Global Network on Electoral Justice
International Foundation for Electoral
- Preview
Resources
Campos v. Ecuador
Document contents
Case of
Cabrera García and Montiel Flores v. Mexico, para. 201; Case of Rosendo Cantú et al. v. Mexico. Preliminary
objection, merits, reparations and costs.
- Preview
Resources
Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors, and Lawyers
Document contents
GAOR, A/54/40 (vol. I), p. 67, para. 350. See also as to Mexico, insofar as there was no independent
body to investigate the substantial
- Preview
Resources
Mediation and Post Election Litigation: A Way Forward
Document contents
(1980) (any elector can contest results); N.M. STAT. ANN. §1-14-1 (2004)
(New Mexico statute allows a candidate to contest the results of an election in court)
- Preview
Resources
Equal Access: How to Include Persons with Disabilities in Elections and Political Processes
Document contents
candidates and Mexico City mayoral candidates, with the exception of one
party. Through these discussions ‒ which were the first-ever in Mexico between presidential
- Preview
Resources
When Are Elections Good Enough? Validating or Annulling Election Results
Document contents
Electoral Legislation of Mexico, Opinion No. 680 / 2012 CDL-AD(2013)021,
http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2013)021-e.
14
While judicial interlocutors in Mexico have told us
- Preview
Resources
The Resolution of Election Disputes: Legal Principles That Control Election Challenges
Document contents
Alabama (8), Alaska (1), Delaware (1), Hawaii (2),
Nevada (1), New Mexico (2), Vermont (1), and
Wyoming (1). In addition, Connecticut, Maryland,
Michigan
- Preview
Resources
Institutional Revolutionary Party v. Andrés Manuel López Obrador (SUP RAP 0268 2012)
Judgment
Institutional Revolutionary Party v. Miguel Angel Yunes Linares (SUP JRC 0168 2016)
Judgment
MOREA v. Party of Institutional Revolutionary (SUP 2015 REP 544 499367)
Judgment
