Election Judgments - IFES

Communist Party of Russia v. Russia

"Mūsu Zeme" v. Latvia (dec.), 2007). 89. In Communist Party of Russia and Others v. Russia, 2012, the Court addressed the question whether the State had

brennancenter.org/our-work/analysisopinion/new-evidence-shows-how-russias-election-interference-has-gotten-more; and Ibid. 36 Henley, J. (2020, May 7). Global report: Russia becomes Europe’s coronavirus hotspot.

§ 5 of the Rules of Court (ibid., § 76; see also Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 195, ECHR 2010 (extracts)). 35. The foregoing factors are not

Reform and Electoral Systems] (Tokyo: Ashi Shobou, 1993), pp. 292–96 Russia Demidov, B., ‘Russia: integrity assessment’, Global Integrity Country Report 2004, available

from the Ottoman Empire. 15. In early 1918, Bessarabia declared its independence from Russia and, on 27 March 1918, united with Romania. The population of Bessarabia became

the Republic of Moldova, Monaco, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, “the former Yugoslav Republic

similar laws in at least 13 other countries, including Venezuela, Vietnam, India, Russia, Malaysia, and Kenya, which have expanded the scope of content from unlawful

II 3.3 and Explanatory Report, para. 92-102. 26 See e.g. Davydov and others v. Russia, 30 May 2017, para. 287; Riza and others v. Bulgaria, 13 October 2015, para.

European Convention on Human Rights. For example, in the Case of Gusinskiy v. Russia, the European Court considered that the restriction of the victim’s detention,

and the USSR on the Peace Treaty of 11 August 1920 between Latvia and Russia, which is still in force and which recognises the independence of the

§ 50, Reports 1997-VI; 12 ATAKISHI v. AZERBAIJAN JUDGMENT Cherepkov v. Russia (dec.), no. 51501/99, ECHR 2000-I; Ždanoka v. Latvia (dec.), no. 58278/00, 6

first resumes after the election. In special cases such as Italy, Kenya and Russia, EDR process can last for more than a year. Having such a long

information of all kinds be permitted to circulate freely (see Orlovskaya Iskra v. Russia, no. 42911/08, § 110, 21 February 2017). This is especially true when

of its candidates (see Russian Conservative Party of Entrepreneurs and Others v. Russia, nos. 55066/00 and 55638/00, §§ 53-67, 11 January 2007.). 73. As to the

Pierre-Bloch v. France, 21 October 1997, § 50, Reports 1997-VI; Cherepkov v. Russia (dec.), no. 51501/99, ECHR 2000-I; Ždanoka v. Latvia (dec.), no. 58278/00, 6

Rapporteur’s Mission to Kazakhstan, 2005, para 59; Special Rapporteur’s Mission to Russia, 2009, A/HRC/11/41/Add.2, 23 March 2009, para 61; Special Rapporteur’s Mission to

Office of the Director of National Intelligence in January 2017 noted that Russia had conducted “cyber-intrusions” into various election platforms of state and local

stations in the Russian Federation and referred some 54,000 registered voters residing in Russia to vote at diplomatic representations of Ukraine in three neighboring states. According

Office of the Director of National Intelligence in January 2017 noted that Russia had conducted “cyber-intrusions” into various election platforms of state and local

Pierre-Bloch v. France, 21 October 1997, § 50, Reports 1997-VI; Cherepkov v. Russia (dec.), no. 51501/99, ECHR 2000-I; Ždanoka v. Latvia (dec.), no. 58278/00, 6

piece of information, such as passwords. This method of attack was used by Russia in targeting the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016.87 A phishing

Denmark, Estonia, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden and Turkey have opted for one or other variant of proportional

the results and conduct of the election); see also Communist Party of Russia v. Russia, App. No. 29400/05 Eur. Ct. H.R ¶ 124 (2012) (reinforcing the Aliyev

prohibits the individualised evaluation of their capacities and needs (cf. Shtukaturov v. Russia, no. § 95, 27 March 2008). Annex 43. The applicant in the present

Krasnov v. Russia, the Court reaffirmed that Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 implicitly embraces the right to stand for election. Krasnov v. Russia, Eur. Ct