Caamaño Valle v. Spain
Document contents
Germany, Greece, Ireland, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Slovakia. This exclusion is either
set out in the country’s constitution or in
Judgment
Strøbye & Rosenlind v. Denmark
Document contents
AND ROSENLIND v. DENMARK JUDGMENT
Luxembourg, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Slovakia. This exclusion is either
set out in the country’s constitution or in
Judgment
Iskra v. Russia
Document contents
be given a
wider possible interpretation. In 1999 the Constitutional Court of Slovakia
declared a similar statute unconstitutional, dismissing the argument
justifying the
- Preview
Resources
Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook
Document contents
Súd) of Slovakia. Judges are appointed by the
President acting on a proposal from the National Council (Národná rada)
of the Slovak Republic. The
- Preview
Resources
Gorzelik v. Poland-
Document contents
and this has never been
denied – Germans, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Lithuanians, Slovaks, Czechs, Jews,
Roma, Armenians and Tatars.
In the Polish tradition, national
- Preview
Resources
Sitaropoulos v. Greece
Document contents
of Moldova,
Monaco, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia,
Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, “the former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”,
- Preview
Resources
Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors, and Lawyers
Document contents
President’s decisions must be ratified by Parliament.
Likewise, as regards Slovakia the Committee has noted with concern that the
rules in force “governing
- Preview
Resources
8 shown of 8 entities