APDH v. Cote d'Ivoire
Document contents
European Court of Human Rights declared
in the Matter ofYumak and Sadak v Turkey that:
“With regard to electoral systems, the Court’s task is to determine
Judgment
Tanganyika Law Society v. Tanzania
Document contents
similar vein, the European Court of Human Rights in Akdivar and
Others v Turkey Application No 21893/93, Judgment of 16 September
1996, paragraph 66 stated that:
Judgment
Gandhi v. Narain
Document contents
as to cases subsequently arising concerning ineligibility and in
compatibility. In Turkey Article 75 provides inter alia that it shall be the
function of Supreme
Judgment
Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij v. the Netherlands
Document contents
and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP) v. Turkey ([GC], no. 23885/94,
§ 44, ECHR 1999-VIII) and Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others
v. Turkey ([GC], nos. 41340/98, 41342/98,
Judgment
Chester v. Secretary of State for Justice
Document contents
this sphere: Mathieu-Mohin v Belgium
(1987) 10 EHRR 1, para 52; Yumak v Turkey (2008) 48 EHRR 61,
para 109(ii).
56. Fourth, the content of the obligation
Judgment
Obradovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Document contents
and severity of the interference (see, for
example, Selim Sadak and Others v. Turkey, Eur. Court HR, judgement of 11 June 2002), and
whether the eligibility
Judgment
Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook
Document contents
for more than half of the polling stations for
which it was requested
Turkey
2007
Constitutional Court
Annulment of the presidential election results
Colombia
- Preview
Resources
When Are Elections Good Enough? Validating or Annulling Election Results
Document contents
“Republic of Turkey Constitutional Referendum, 16 April 2017: Limited Referendum Observation
Mission Final Report,” June 22, 2017, https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/turkey/324806.
59
Office
- Preview
Resources
Measuring Effective Remedies for Fraud and Administrative Malpractice
Document contents
applications stemming from the same
issue in Turkey had been pending before the Court, and ruled that Turkey was required to put in
place, within a
- Preview
Resources
GUARDE: Directrices para la comprension y resolucion de conflictos electorales
Document contents
disponible en
http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/html/009.htm.
16
Ver también Yumak vs. Turkey, Corte Europea de Derechos Humanos, caso No. 10226/03, juicio del 8
- Preview
Resources
Elections on Trial: The Effective Management of Election Disputes and Violations
Document contents
Tribunal (The Philippines)
Political Parties Disputes Tribunal (Kenya)
Supreme Board of Elections (Turkey)
State Election Commission (Macedonia)
Senate Electoral Tribunal (The Philippines)
Mexican Case
- Preview
Resources
Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors, and Lawyers
Document contents
Case of Incal v. Turkey, judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1547 ff.; Eur.
Court HR, Case of Çiraklar v. Turkey, judgment of 28
- Preview
Resources
When Are Elections Good Enough? Validating or Annulling Election Results
Document contents
“Republic of Turkey Constitutional Referendum, 16 April 2017: Limited Referendum Observation
Mission Final Report,” June 22, 2017, https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/turkey/324806.
59
Office
- Preview
Resources
Election Dispute Resolution Report 2020
Document contents
Slovenia, Spain, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom.
77 Austria, Azerbaijan, Brazil, Chile, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Norway, Serbia, Russian Federation, Turkey,
Ukraine.
78 For
- Preview
Resources
Guide to Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights
Document contents
Greece [GC], no. 42202/07, ECHR 2012
Sobacı v. Turkey, no. 26733/02, 29 November 2007
Söyler v. Turkey, no. 29411/07, 17 September 2013
Staatkundig Gereformeerde
- Preview
Resources
Aliyev v. Azerbaijan
Document contents
effective (see, among many other
authorities, United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey,
30 January 1998, § 33, Reports 1998-I; Chassagnou and Others
- Preview
Resources
Gorzelik v. Poland-
Document contents
of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 30 January 1998,
Reports 1998-I, pp. 20 et seq., §§ 42 et seq.; Socialist Party and Others v.
Turkey,
- Preview
Resources
Hajili v. Azerbaijan
Document contents
effective (see, among many other
authorities, United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey,
30 January 1998, § 33, Reports 1998-I; Chassagnou and Others
- Preview
Resources
GUARDE: Guidelines for Understanding, Adjudicating, and Resolving Disputes in Elections
Document contents
17864/04 and 21396/04, ¶ 42; see also
United Communist Party of Turkey v. Turkey, Eur. Ct. H.R, App. No. 133/1996/752/951, Judgment of 30 Jan. 1998,
- Preview
Resources
Tanase v. Moldova
Document contents
(see United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January
1998, § 45, Reports 1998-I, and Leyla Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98,
§ 108,
- Preview
Resources
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Document contents
TUNISIA:
POUR LA TUNISIE:
3»
PORTÛNEZ:
MAHMOUD MESTIRI
Le 30 avril 1968
FOR TURKEY:
POUR LA TURQUIE:
3»
POR TURQUÎA:
Vol. 999, 1-14668
1976
1976
United
- Preview
Resources
ACHPR Tanganyika Law Society v. Tanzania
Document contents
similar vein, the European Court of Human Rights in Akdivar and
Others v Turkey Application no. 21893/93 Judgment of 16 September
1996 Reports of Judgments and
- Preview
Resources
Election Investigations Guidebook
Document contents
Comment No.
87
Bati and Others v. Turkey, App. No. 33097/96, Eur. Ct. H.R. 136 (2004); see also Aksoy v. Turkey, App. No. 21987/93 Eur. Ct.
H.R.
- Preview
Resources
Kerimova v. Azerbaijan
Document contents
effective (see, among many other
authorities, United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey,
30 January 1998, § 33, Reports 1998-I; Chassagnou and Others
- Preview
Resources
Zdanoka v. Latvia
Document contents
conclusions identified by the
Court in United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey
(30 January 1998, §§ 45-46, Reports 1998-I). The applicant contested
- Preview
Resources
Yumak & Sadak v. Turkey
Description
Second, although thresholds are common across Europe, Turkey remains among the three highest.
- Preview
Resources
Atakishi v. Azerbaijan
Document contents
§ 39, Reports
of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV; and Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey
[GC], no. 10226/03, § 109 (iii), 8 July 2008).
38. The Court notes
- Preview
Resources
Communist Party of Russia v. Russia
Document contents
opinions and information (see, for example,
United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998,
§ 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions
- Preview
Resources
Grosaru v. Romania
Document contents
May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37;
United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998,
§ 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions
- Preview
Resources
