Election Judgments - IFES

immediately by the impugned threshold (see, mutatis mutandis, Moureaux and Others v. Belgium, no. 9267/81, Commission decision of 12 July 1983, Decisions and Reports (DR)

accordingly of prime importance in the Convention system” (Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 1987, § 47). 2. Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 concerns only the choice of

electoral actions and decisions other than electoral results (as in Argentina and Belgium), or including decisions on electoral results, as in the United States, Italy

2015: FINAL REPORT (2015), http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/turkey/219201. 50 Id. 51 ID. 52 Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain

right to vote and to stand for election (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, §§ 46-51, Series A no. 113). The Court has consistently

right to vote and to stand for election (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, §§ 46-51, Series A no. 113). The Court has consistently

New York; and a Doctorate in Law (PhD) from the University of Ghent, Belgium. He has many publications to his credit, including books and articles in

‐11dd-­‐af2b-­‐ b1f6023af0c5/pol300021998en.html).     171  Refiérase  también  a  Boddaert  vs  Belgium,  16  Comité    europeo  en  Derechos  Humanos  242  ¶  39  (1992)  ("Artículo

Belgium’s state security service (VSSE) has warned that extremist organizations in Belgium are leveraging disinformation and inflammatory rhetoric about the pandemic to turn

is provided for in Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden. A handful of countries – Belgium, France, the Netherlands

there is room for implied limitations (see the Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 113, p. 23, § 52). In

in the repeat parliamentary election of 28 March 2004.”). 18 Mathieu-Mohin v. Belgium, Eur. Ct. H.R., Series A no. 113, Judgment of 2 March 1987, ¶ 47

JANKOWITSCH 10 décembre 1973 FOR BARBADOS: POURLABARBADE: 3a Bap6a«oc: POR BARBADOS: FOR BELGIUM: POUR LA BELGIQUE: 3a POR BÉLGICA: FOR BOLIVIA: POUR LA BOLIVIE: 3a

democracy governed by the rule of law. In Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium (2 March 1987, § 47, Series A no. 113), and Lingens v. Austria (8

foundations of a democratic society” (see X v. Belgium, p. 253). 110. In the case of Van Wambeke v. Belgium (no. 16692/90, Commission decision of 12 April

8 ATAKISHI v. AZERBAIJAN JUDGMENT arbitrary (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, § 52, Series A no. 113; Gitonas and Others v. Greece

of the legislature”. In the 1987 case of Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium (judgment of 2 March 1987, § 54, Series A no. 113), the Court noted

beyond validation of powers by the legislative chamber are in western Europe (Belgium, Italy and Luxembourg). The tendency towards investing courts with jurisdiction for

placements complained of were part of an educative programme, emphasizing that Belgium “was under an obligation to put in place appropriate institutional facilities

right to vote and to stand for election (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, §§ 46-51, Series A no. 113). The Court has consistently

such as Belgium or Germany, the majority of the assessors of the electoral boards/committees are appointed by the chairman (a judge in Belgium; the Federal

(2008) (reviewing conflict of interest provisions in the electoral laws of Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Moldova, Portugal

СПРАВА «МАТЬЄ-МОЕН І КЛЕРФЕТ ПРОТИ БЕЛЬГІЇ» (MATHIEU-MOHIN AND CLERFAYT V. BELGIUM) (ЗАЯВА № 9267/81) 2 БЕРЕЗНЯ 1987 РОКУ п. 53 Дія статті 3

65 Belgium, Denmark, Iceland, Italy, partially Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia, Switzerland (shared with the Supreme Federal Tribunal). 66 Belgium, Denmark

of the amount of the fine imposed for criminal misconduct. For example, in Belgium, criminal offences related to electoral fraud can be penalized by imprisonment

23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298; De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports 1997-I; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas