Search Tips
sorted by
10 shown of 10 entities
Bujdoso v. Hungary
Document contents
non-pecuniary compensation.
11
The interveners observe that some States, such as Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United
Kingdom, as well as several Canadian provinces and some
- Question Presented
- Whether Hungary's automatic disenfranchisement of persons with disabilities placed under guardianship—without individualized assessment of their capacity to vote and based solely on their disability status—violates articles 2, 12, and 29 of the CRPD.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Voters' Rights
- Country
- Hungary
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Oct 16, 2013
Judgment
Bush v. Gore
Document contents
for State Prisoners, 76 Harv. L. Rev. 441, 509
(1963)); see O’Dell v. Netherland, 521 U. S. 151, 156 (1997)
(“[T]he Teague doctrine validates reasonable,
- Question Presented
- Did the Florida Supreme Court violate Article II Section 1 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution by making new election law? Do standardless manual recounts violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Constitution?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Disputing Results
- Vote Verification and Transmission
- Country
- United States of America
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Dec 12, 2000
Judgment
Caamaño Valle v. Spain
Document contents
out of the 28 EU Member States – Austria, Croatia, Italy, Latvia, the
Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom – guarantee the right to vote for all
- Question Presented
- Whether the rescission of voting rights for disabled person under guardianship based on individualized assessment is legal under Article 3, Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Country
- Spain
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Aug 11, 2021
Judgment
Chester v. Secretary of State for Justice
Document contents
Parliamentary elections upon Dutch nationals residing in the
Netherlands or abroad except in Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles. After
repeating (para 45) that “in the
- Legal Issue(s)
- Judicial Independence
- Voter Registration
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Oct 16, 2013
Judgment
Molka v. Poland
Document contents
POLAND DECISION
or family life (see, inter alia, X and Y v. the Netherlands, judgment of
26 March 1985, Series A no. 91, p. 11, § 23, and
- Question Presented
- Did Poland violate the European Charter of Human Rights by being indifferent to the inaccessibility of poll stations?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Country
- Poland
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Apr 11, 2006
Judgment
Obradovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Document contents
in certain specific cases (see Eur. Court HR, Engel and Others v. The Netherlands,
judgement of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, pp. 33-36, paragraphs 80-85)
- Question Presented
- Whether the plaintiff's dismissal from the military banned him from participating in the General Election?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Candidate Registration
- Country
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Oct 10, 2003
Judgment
Odinga v. IEBC
Document contents
jurisdictions, notably
Australia; New Zealand; Canada; the United Kingdom; Ireland; the
Netherlands; India and South Africa, also makes a clear distinction between
Presidential
- Question Presented
- Which party has the burden of proof to contest an election?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Disputing Results
- Electoral Integrity
- Country
- Kenya
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Sep 1, 2017
Judgment
Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij v. the Netherlands
Procedural history
The Netherlands appealed this decision to the Court of Appeal of the Hague in December 2007.
- Question Presented
- Whether religiously affiliated parties can exclude women from running as candidates on the grounds that forcing the party to host women candidates violates its freedom of religious expression, as it believes women are unsuited for public office?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Gender
- Country
- Netherlands
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Jul 10, 2012
Judgment
Strøbye & Rosenlind v. Denmark
Document contents
out of the 28 EU Member States – Austria, Croatia, Italy, Latvia, the
Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom – guarantee the right to vote for all
- Question Presented
- Whether the automatic removal of persons contravened Article 3, Protocol No. 1 of European Convention on Human Rights and, consequently, constituted illegal discrimination under Article 14 under the same Convention.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Voters' Rights
- Country
- Denmark
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Feb 2, 2021
Judgment
10 shown of 10 entities