Search Tips
sorted by
8 shown of 8 entities
Caamaño Valle v. Spain
Document contents
have been
deprived of their legal capacity from voting. The Member States are Belgium,
Bulgaria, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta
- Question Presented
- Whether the rescission of voting rights for disabled person under guardianship based on individualized assessment is legal under Article 3, Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Country
- Spain
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Aug 11, 2021
- Date added
- Jul 7, 2026
Judgment
Molka v. Poland
Document contents
of the State in
question. In the case of Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, the 1980
constitutional reform had vested in the Flemish Council sufficient
- Question Presented
- Did Poland violate the European Charter of Human Rights by being indifferent to the inaccessibility of poll stations?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Country
- Poland
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Apr 11, 2006
- Date added
- Jul 7, 2026
Judgment
Strøbye & Rosenlind v. Denmark
Document contents
have been
deprived of their legal capacity from voting. The Member States are Belgium,
Bulgaria, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Lithuania,
22
STRØBYE
- Question Presented
- Whether the automatic removal of persons contravened Article 3, Protocol No. 1 of European Convention on Human Rights and, consequently, constituted illegal discrimination under Article 14 under the same Convention.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Voters' Rights
- Country
- Denmark
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Feb 2, 2021
- Date added
- Jul 7, 2026
Judgment
Anatoliy Marinov v. Bulgaria
Document contents
and to stand for election (see,
inter alia, Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, § 51,
Series A no. 113, and Selahattin Demirtaş v.
- Question Presented
- Whether the automatic removal of a voter's rights under partial guardianship contravenes Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Furthermore, whether the blanket provision of removal is proportional to the state's legitimate aims and whether the absence of individualized judicial review deprives a voter's due process rights.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Voters' Rights
- Country
- Bulgaria
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Feb 28, 2022
- Date added
- Jul 7, 2026
Judgment
Alajos Kiss v. Hungary
Document contents
right to vote and to stand for election (see MathieuMohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 113, pp. 2223, §§ 46-51).
- Question Presented
- Whether Hungary's voting restriction was proportional and legitimate under Article 1, Protocol 3
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Elections as a Fundamental Right
- Voters' Rights
- Country
- Hungary
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- May 20, 2010
- Date added
- Jul 7, 2026
Judgment
Chester v. Secretary of State for Justice
Document contents
as
Belgium for cases in which the prisoner is sentenced to a period of imprisonment
exceeding a given threshold. In France, the Netherlands and Belgium
dis
- Legal Issue(s)
- Judicial Independence
- Voter Registration
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Oct 16, 2013
- Date added
- Jun 23, 2020
Judgment
APDH v. Cote d'Ivoire
Document contents
to vote
and to stand as a candidate in elections (Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v Belgium,
Judgment of 2 March 1987, series A No 113, paras 46-51).
APDH v Côte
- Question Presented
- Whether the composition of the IEC is in conformity with the Constitution.
- Legal Issue(s)
- EMB Independence
- EMB Operation
- Country
- Ivory Coast
- Language of Decision
- English
- French
- Date of decision
- Nov 18, 2016
- Date added
- Aug 1, 2019
Judgment
Obradovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Document contents
3 of the
First Protocol to the Convention, Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium (Eur. Court HR, judgement of
2 March 1987, Series A no. 113) the European
- Question Presented
- Whether the plaintiff's dismissal from the military banned him from participating in the General Election?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Candidate Registration
- Country
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Oct 10, 2003
- Date added
- Jul 8, 2019
Judgment
8 shown of 8 entities