Election Judgments - IFES

Election Judgments - IFES

    • About
    • Judgments
    • Resources
    • Contact and Submissions
    • User Guide
    • Library
    • Sign in
Search Tips
sorted by
  • Title
  • Date added
  • Date modified
  • Search relevance
  • Region
  • Country
  • Court
  • Election Type
  • Date of decision
Cards viewTable viewMap view
4 shown of 4 entities

Călin Georgescu v. Romania

Document contents
light of the legal arguments adduced and vice versa (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 110, 20 March 2018). 34. The Court notes
Question Presented
Did the Constitutional Court of Romania err in annulling the first round of elections or infringe upon Georgescu's right to a free election?
Legal Issue(s)
  • Electoral Integrity
  • Improper Practices
  • Social Media
  • Technology
Country
Romania
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Mar 6, 2025
Date added
Jul 28, 2026
Judgment
View

Caamaño Valle v. Spain

Document contents
40-41; footnotes omitted): “Seven out of the 28 EU Member States – Austria, Croatia, Italy, Latvia, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom – guarantee
Show more
Question Presented
Whether the rescission of voting rights for disabled person under guardianship based on individualized assessment is legal under Article 3, Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Accessibility
Country
Spain
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Aug 11, 2021
Date added
Jul 7, 2026
Judgment
View

Molka v. Poland

Document contents
embrace aspects of an individual’s physical and social identity (see Mikulić v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 53, ECHR 2002-I). Article 8 also protects a right to
Question Presented
Did Poland violate the European Charter of Human Rights by being indifferent to the inaccessibility of poll stations?
Legal Issue(s)
  • Accessibility
Country
Poland
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Apr 11, 2006
Date added
Jul 7, 2026
Judgment
View

Strøbye & Rosenlind v. Denmark

Document contents
things (pages 40-41): “Seven out of the 28 EU Member States – Austria, Croatia, Italy, Latvia, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom – guarantee
Show more
Question Presented
Whether the automatic removal of persons contravened Article 3, Protocol No. 1 of European Convention on Human Rights and, consequently, constituted illegal discrimination under Article 14 under the same Convention.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Accessibility
  • Voters' Rights
Country
Denmark
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Feb 2, 2021
Date added
Jul 7, 2026
Judgment
View

4 shown of 4 entities

  • Uwazi is developed by Human Rights Information and Documentation Systems

    uwazi
  •  
  • Election Judgments - IFES
  •  
  • Library
  • Login
Filters
    •  4
    •  8
  • Legal Issue(s)
    ANDOR
    • 3
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
  • Region
    • 4
  • Country
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
  • Language of Decision
    ANDOR
    • 4
  • Court
    • 4
  • Election Type
    • 2
    • 1
    • 1
  • Form:
    To:

No text match

You can type something different in the search box to get some results.

    Table of contents

     

    No table of contents

    You can start by selecting text in the document and clicking the "Add to ToC" button.

      No References

      References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

      No Relationships

      Relationships are bonds between entities.

      0 selected

        Notifications

        You're all caught up

        New activity will show up here.