Denmark, Iceland, Italy, partially Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia, Switzerland (shared with the Supreme Federal Tribunal). 66 Belgium, Denmark, Iceland, Italy

requirements of paragraph 2 (see, mutatis mutandis, the Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland judgment of 25 June 1992, Series A no. 239, p. 27, § 64). 54.

an election is illustrated by the annulment of the 2010 Icelandic Constitutional Assembly election. The Icelandic Supreme Court invalidated the election of Assembly members based

citizenship to their children”.169 It also welcomed the 1998 amendment to Icelandic legislation, which addressed “the unequal rights of men and women with

thresholds are applied only to a restricted number of seats (in Norway and Iceland, for example). Thresholds for parties and thresholds for coalitions may be

about the way they cast their ballots. 41. Two member States (Albania and Iceland) have explicitly regulated the issue of revealing voting choices through the

the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Republic of Moldova, Monaco,

(United Kingdom v. Iceland), Jurisdiction of the Court, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1973, p. 7, para. 12; Fisheries Jurisdiction (United Kingdom v. Iceland), Merits, Judgment

HUNGARY:' POUR LA HONGRIE: ' 3a PORHUNCRÎA: KÂROLY CSATORDAY March 25, 1969 FOR ICELAND: POUR L'ISLANDE: 3a POR ISLANDIA: HANNES KJARTANSSON 30 Dec. 1968 FOR INDIA:

an election is illustrated by the annulment of the 2010 Icelandic Constitutional Assembly election. The Icelandic Supreme Court invalidated the election of Assembly members based

box 5.4) and Switzerland, this category should include the EDRSs of Belgium, Iceland, the Netherlands and Norway, as well as certain Central and East European

to the independence and impartiality of judges or arbiters making decisions on 6 Icelandic Human Rights Centre, The Right to Due Process, http://www.humanrights.is/en/human-rightseducation-proj