Election Judgments - IFES

Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Montenegro, the Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, 18

of appreciation as regards Article 13 of the Convention (see Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 75, ECHR 1999-VII) and that the legislative provisions

principle, compatible with Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 (see Hilbe v. Liechtenstein (dec.), no. 31981/96, ECHR 1999-VI; see also Hirst, cited above, § 62).

of every individual case but must lay down a general rule (Hilbe v. Liechtenstein (dec.), 1999; Doyle v. the United Kingdom (dec.), 2007; Shindler v. the

States have opted for high thresholds: Turkey has the highest, at 10%; Liechtenstein has an 8% threshold; and the Russian Federation and Georgia a 7% one

Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Republic of Moldova, Monaco, the Netherlands, Norway,

• Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 270 FOR LIECHTENSTEIN: POUR LE LIECHTENSTEIN: 3a POR LIECHTENSTEIN: FOR LUXEMBOURG: POUR LE LUXEMBOURG: &&&'• 3a JIioKceMÔypr: