Election Judgments - IFES

Election Judgments - IFES

    • About
    • Judgments
    • Resources
    • Contact and Submissions
    • User Guide
    • Library
    • Sign in
Search Tips
sorted by
  • Title
  • Date added
  • Date modified
  • Search relevance
  • Region
  • Country
  • Court
  • Election Type
  • Date of decision
Cards viewTable viewMap view
4 shown of 4 entities

Gandhi v. Narain

Document contents
functions. As observed by Cardozo, J., in his dissenting opinion in Panama Refining Company v. Ryan. (1934) 293 US 388,440 the principle of separation
Question Presented
Whether legislative acts passed during the appeals process may be retroactively applied to validate an election currently in the courts.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Disputing Results
  • Judicial Independence
Country
India
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Jul 11, 1975
Date added
Sep 23, 2020
Judgment
View

In Re Case No. 9768, 9780 & 9828

Document contents
forces (page 308). 61. In its Report on the Human Rights Situation in Panama in 1989, the Commission stated regarding the electoral process that lead to
Show more
Question Presented
Whether the elections violated the citizen’s political rights even though the domestic options were exhausted.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Electoral Integrity
  • EMB Independence
  • EMB Operation
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
May 17, 1990
Date added
Jul 8, 2020
Judgment
View

Tanganyika Law Society v. Tanzania

Document contents
and legitimate. This approach is settled in Baena Ricardo and others against Panama (Judgment of 2 February 2001). TLS and Others v Tanzania (merits) (2013)
Question Presented
Whether the Tanzania regulation prohibiting independent candidates from seeking public office is unconstitutional?
Legal Issue(s)
  • Candidate Registration
  • Judicial Independence
Country
Tanzania. United Republic of
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Jun 14, 2019
Date added
Aug 1, 2019
Judgment
View

Bangladesh 16th amendment ruling

Document contents
tomorrow in foresee their today nearly the infinite variety (Ref. Panama Refining Co. Vs. Rayan 79 LED 446). “The Constitution is neither, on
Question Presented
Does the 16th amendment, which allows the legislature to remove Supreme Court justices on grounds of incapacity or misconduct, violate the Constitution?
Legal Issue(s)
  • EMB Independence
  • Judicial Independence
Country
Bangladesh
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Jul 3, 2017
Date added
Jul 8, 2019
Judgment
View

4 shown of 4 entities

  • Uwazi is developed by Human Rights Information and Documentation Systems

    uwazi
  •  
  • Election Judgments - IFES
  •  
  • Library
  • Login
Filters
    •  4
    •  5
  • Legal Issue(s)
    ANDOR
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
  • Region
    • 2
    • 1
    • 1
  • Country
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
    • 1
  • Language of Decision
    ANDOR
    • 4
  • Court
    • 3
    • 1
  • Election Type
    • 2
    • 1
    • 1
  • Form:
    To:

No text match

You can type something different in the search box to get some results.

    Table of contents

     

    No Table of Contents

    Table of Contents allows users to navigate easier throught the document.

      No References

      References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

      No Relationships

      Relationships are bonds between entities.

      0 selected
        Upload a ZIP or CSV file. Import instructions