Search Tips
sorted by
5 shown of 5 entities
Caamaño Valle v. Spain
Document contents
Bulgaria, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Slovakia. This exclusion is either
set out in the
- Question Presented
- Whether the rescission of voting rights for disabled person under guardianship based on individualized assessment is legal under Article 3, Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Country
- Spain
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Aug 11, 2021
- Date added
- Jul 7, 2026
Judgment
Molka v. Poland
- Question Presented
- Did Poland violate the European Charter of Human Rights by being indifferent to the inaccessibility of poll stations?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Country
- Poland
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Apr 11, 2006
- Date added
- Jul 7, 2026
Judgment
Strøbye & Rosenlind v. Denmark
Document contents
Ireland, Lithuania,
22
STRØBYE AND ROSENLIND v. DENMARK JUDGMENT
Luxembourg, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Slovakia. This exclusion is either
set out in the
- Question Presented
- Whether the automatic removal of persons contravened Article 3, Protocol No. 1 of European Convention on Human Rights and, consequently, constituted illegal discrimination under Article 14 under the same Convention.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Voters' Rights
- Country
- Denmark
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Feb 2, 2021
- Date added
- Jul 7, 2026
Judgment
Sinnott v. Minister for the Environment
Document contents
The Environment [2017] IEHC 214 (30 March 2017)
identified how the United Kingdom, Poland, Austria, Malta, Spain, Germany, Australia and the United
States of America had all
- Question Presented
- Whether the plaintiff's inability to cast a secret ballot based on his visual impairment violated his right to vote.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Elections as a Fundamental Right
- Country
- Ireland
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Mar 30, 2017
- Date added
- Jun 11, 2020
Judgment
Wisconsin Legislature v. Evers (state Supreme Court Decision, please see United States Supreme Court order on the application for stay)
Document contents
Eimer Stahl LLP
10 East Doty Street, Ste. 800
Madison, WI 53703
Douglas M. Poland
David Perry Hollander
Rathje Woodward LLC
10 E. Doty Street, Ste. 507
Madison, WI
- Question Presented
- Whether the Governor may suspend election laws two days before the election?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Accessibility
- Electoral Integrity
- Health Concerns & Election Administration
- Country
- United States of America
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Apr 6, 2020
- Date added
- Jun 2, 2020
Judgment
5 shown of 5 entities