In re 2016 Election of President of Iceland
Procedural history
The Supreme Court of Iceland stated that the court’s authority to review elections processes during Presidential
Judgment
In re the Icelandic Presidential Election of 2012
Country
Iceland
Judgment
In re Constituent Assembly Elections of 2011
Country
Iceland
Judgment
Election Dispute Resolution Report 2020
Document contents
Denmark, Iceland, Italy, partially Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia,
Switzerland (shared with the Supreme Federal Tribunal).
66 Belgium, Denmark, Iceland, Italy
- Preview
Resources
Sitaropoulos v. Greece
Document contents
the Czech Republic, Denmark,
Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Italy,
Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Republic of Moldova,
Monaco,
- Preview
Resources
When Are Elections Good Enough? Validating or Annulling Election Results
Document contents
an election is illustrated by
the annulment of the 2010 Icelandic Constitutional Assembly election. The Icelandic Supreme Court
invalidated the election of Assembly members based
- Preview
Resources
When Are Elections Good Enough? Validating or Annulling Election Results
Document contents
an election is illustrated by
the annulment of the 2010 Icelandic Constitutional Assembly election. The Icelandic Supreme Court
invalidated the election of Assembly members based
- Preview
Resources
Yumak & Sadak v. Turkey
Document contents
thresholds are applied only to a
restricted number of seats (in Norway and Iceland, for example). Thresholds
for parties and thresholds for coalitions may be
- Preview
Resources
New Nation Movement NPC and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa
Document contents
the negative right not to be coerced to associate was at issue. In
Iceland a licence to operate a taxicab was granted subject to membership of a
Judgment
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Document contents
HUNGARY:'
POUR LA HONGRIE: '
3a
PORHUNCRÎA:
KÂROLY CSATORDAY
March 25, 1969
FOR ICELAND:
POUR L'ISLANDE:
3a
POR ISLANDIA:
HANNES KJARTANSSON
30 Dec. 1968
FOR INDIA:
- Preview
Resources
Elections on Trial: The Effective Management of Election Disputes and Violations
Document contents
to the independence
and impartiality of judges or arbiters making decisions on
6
Icelandic Human Rights Centre, The Right to Due Process, http://www.humanrights.is/en/human-rightseducation-proj
- Preview
Resources
Incal v. Turkey
Document contents
requirements of
paragraph 2 (see, mutatis mutandis, the Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland
judgment of 25 June 1992, Series A no. 239, p. 27, § 64).
54.
- Preview
Resources
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights v. Republic of Peru
Document contents
(United Kingdom v. Iceland), Jurisdiction of the Court, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1973, p. 7,
para. 12; Fisheries Jurisdiction (United Kingdom v. Iceland), Merits, Judgment
- Preview
Resources
In re Magyar Ketfarku Kutya Part v. Hungary
Document contents
about the way they
cast their ballots.
41. Two member States (Albania and Iceland) have explicitly regulated
the issue of revealing voting choices through the
- Preview
Resources
Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook
Document contents
box 5.4) and Switzerland, this category
should include the EDRSs of Belgium, Iceland, the Netherlands and Norway,
as well as certain Central and East European
- Preview
Resources
Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors, and Lawyers
Document contents
citizenship to their children”.169 It also welcomed the 1998 amendment to Icelandic
legislation, which addressed “the unequal rights of men and women with
- Preview
Resources
Gandhi v. Narain
Document contents
majority of two-thirds or
more of the members present. Article 46 of the Iceland Constitution provides
that the Althing itself decides whether its members are
Judgment
17 shown of 17 entities