Election Judgments - IFES

judgments related to Article 3 of the First Additional Protocol of the Convention.26 Poland, Portugal, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, San Marino, Serbia, Slovak

elected bodies, facilitate the representation of minority organisations. In Germany and Poland, threshold rules do not apply to such organisations. The Belgian system is

of remedies provided for under domestic law may do so” (see Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI). 83. The first question is what

The following are the relevant excerpts from this report, published in Warsaw, Poland on 1 February 2006: “III. POLITICAL BACKGROUND ... The 6 November 2005 elections

entail are in conformity with the Convention (see Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, § 67, ECHR 2004-I). 113. The Court also made the

Poland-

the three Baltic States of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. After Germany’s invasion of Poland on 1 September 1939 and the subsequent start of the Second World War, the Soviet

only in exceptional circumstances (the Czech Republic, Denmark, Greece, Lithuania and Poland) and six (Austria, Estonia, Germany, Latvia, the Netherlands and Spain) allow

виборів). 69 Claudia Ciobanu, Poland Postpones Presidential Election, Balkan Insight (7 травня 2020 р.), адреса: https://balkaninsight.com/2020/05/07/poland-postpones-presidential-election/. 70 ACE:

Alexandria, Weil, Quadrate, Glenmora, Union Church, Pineville, Welchton, Borland, Poland, and Hammond, thus including all the precincts in Rapides parish except

33-35; OSCE, Handbook for the Observation of New Voting Technologies, (Warsaw, Poland: 2013), 70-71. 14 Cybersecurity in Elections: Developing a Holistic Exposure and

legislative power may not be restricted to the national parliament alone (Mółka v. Poland (dec.), 2006). However, having examined the Italian constitutional structure, the Court has

14. 9 Ibid., loc. cit.; emphasis added. 10 See e.g. as to Poland, UN doc. GAOR, A/55/44, p. 22, para. 94. 320 Human Rights in

the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden and Turkey have opted for one or

into account the changes in everyday practice (see Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, § 65, ECHR 2004-I). At the same time, the Court

Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Republic of Moldova, Monaco, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, “the

from the pandemic undermine their popularity. For example, the ruling party in Poland was forced to change track after insisting until days before the presidential

election). 69 Claudia Ciobanu, Poland Postpones Presidential Election, Balkan Insight (May 7, 2020), available at https://balkaninsight.com/2020/05/07/poland-postpones-presidential-election/. 70 ACE:

of banning the use of certain funds in election campaigns; for example, in Poland, the law prevents campaign expenditures from being paid for using national

THE PHILIPPINES: POUR LES PHILIPPINES: 3a POR FILIPINAS: SALVADOR P. LÔPEZ FOR POLAND: POUR LA POLOGNE : 3a POR POLONIA : B. TOMOROWICZ 2.III.1967' FOR PORTUGAL:

nnormsstandards.pdf/view. 135 50 Chapter 1: International Standards In Kwiecien v. Poland, the European Court of Human Rights acknowledged the legality of summary proceedings

 plazos   fijos  para  la  resolución  de  quejas  electorales.138    En   Kwiecien   vs   Poland,   la   Corte   Europea   de   Derechos   Humanos   reconoció   la   legalidad   de

is separate to whether a remedy is available in the law. In Kudla v Poland the Court observed that whether the applicant benefitted from a civil rights

have this type of EDRS. Examples are Bosnia and Herzegovina, Estonia, Hungary, Poland, Russia and Serbia, where the final decision on challenges to election results