Election Judgments - IFES

place where the act was committed.”148 Some countries—including Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru—require complainants to attach supporting documentary evidence for

arrests and detentions under 189 I-A Court HR, Suárez Rosero Case v. Ecuador, judgment of November 12, 1997, in OAS doc. OAS/Ser.L/V/III.39, doc. 5

Ecuador claimed that the termination of the judges was justified because they were elected through single

3a JXoMHHHKaHCKyio Pecnyfijuucy: POR LA REPÛBLICA DOMINICANA: FOR ECUADOR: POUR L'EQUATEUR: 3a POR EL ECUADOR: HUGO FÂTIVA ORTIZ Abril 4 de 1968' FOR EL SALVADOR:

2009 for the National Electoral Council and the Electoral Tribunal of Ecuador. Both institutions were reorganized and acquired new functions after a

para   el   Consejo   Nacional   Electoral   y   el   Tribunal   Electoral   del   Ecuador.     Se   reorganizaron   ambas   instituciones   y   se   les   confirieron   nuevas

and spoiled ballot papers. 21 Some countries – including Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru – require complainants to attach supporting documentary evidence

different timelines depending on the nature of the dispute. For example, in Ecuador it can take 2, 9 or 30 days to complete the EDR process depending

the judiciary, or on some of the specialized electoral courts – as in Ecuador and Mexico. In this way, the EJS provides a comprehensive defence of electoral