Election Judgments - IFES

Czech Republic, Kazakhstan. 140 Algeria, Andorra, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Croatia, Estonia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Lithuania

of Election Disputes. Mr. Weinberg’s work with IFES started in 1995 in Kazakhstan where he led workshops on voting rights. Over 2000 and 2001, Mr. Weinberg

Judiciary in the LawAsia Region, para 42. 10 Special Rapporteur’s Mission to Kazakhstan, 2005, E/CN.4/2005/60/Add.2 11 January 2005, para 26. 69 Para 14. 70 See

in the report concerning Mexico. 50 See, for example, with regard to Kazakhstan, UN doc. GAOR, A/56/44, p. 55, para. 129(m). 51 Ibid., p. 54

practices in resolving election disputes. This programme was implemented only in Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan but has resulted in the design of a standard monitoring methodology

others for the electoral campaign.” Id. at 13. 51 OSCE/ODIHR, Republic of Kazakhstan Early Presidential Election 26 April 2015: Election Observation Mission Final Report

Human Rights, Republic of Kazakhstan: Review of the Election Legislation for Election Disputes, Appeals and Penalties 2 (2001) [hereinafter Kazakhstan Report], available at

 lo  sucesivo  el  Informe  de  Kazajstán],  disponible  en   http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/kazakhstan/item/14597.     226  Convención  de  la  mancomunidad  de  naciones,  supra  note  39

REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN: REVIEW OF THE ELECTION LEGISLATION FOR ELECTION DISPUTES, APPEALS AND PENALTIES 5 (2001), available at http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/kazakhstan/14597?download=true.

to classify under this model the cases of Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Kazakhstan and Mozambique, which give a Constitutional Council which is not part of