both appellants and the respondent very carefully. The learned trial judge discussed the evidence adduced regarding the allegations of bribery in this case in details from her judgment commencing from pages 100-118 and came to the conclusion thus: “In conclusion and on the evidence above. I find that several acts of bribery were committed by the 1st Respondent either directly or through his agents with his knowledge and I answer this issue in the affirmative”. I have perused carefully the evidence adduced in connection with the allegations of bribery in this case and I agree entirely with the findings of the learned trial judge. I have no justification at all to fault her in her finding. In the premises, ground I of this appeal must fail. Ground 2(b) – 2(g) and briefly ground 2(h) which overlaps all the grounds. Ground 2(b)-2(g) states: 2) That the learned trial Judge erred in law and fact when she failed to properly evaluate the evidence presented before her and as a result came to wrong decisions that during the conduct of Mukono North Parliamentary Election:b) The 1st appellant’s agents connived with the 2nd appellant’s agents to commit electoral malpractices to the detriment of the respondent. c) The 1st appellant had disenfranchised voters who were registered to vote at Gwafu I and Gwafu II polling stations and other polling stations that affected the result in a substantial manner. d) The 1st appellant’s agents forged election results. e) The Declaration of results forms and tally sheet showed that there were ballot papers that were not accounted for. f) No sufficient light was provided by the 1st appellant. g) She shifted the burden of proof onto the appellants. Disfranchisement at Gwafu I and Gwafu II and other Polling Stations: Counsel for the appellants pointed out that the learned trial judge at page 15 of her judgment held thus: “After perusal of the evidence on this point, the Court also finds that the allegations that a number of voters who were issued voters cards to vote at Gwafu I and II did not vote because they were told on