Station, appellants’ counsel contend that at page 44 of her judgment, the learned trial judge formulated some questions thereby shifting the burden of proof to the appellants. Counsel contend that Nakiwala Prossy, the Presiding Officer at Takkajunge Polling Station, in rebuttal in support of the 2nd Respondent/1st appellant, swore an affidavit stating that she saw only 10 students and allowed them to vote because they had voter’s cards. Counsel point out that the trial judge analysed the evidence of Nakiwala Prossy and made the following findings: “This witness admits that there were complaints. That students from Greenville S.S came and voted. That Banana also came to the polling station. There is however a contradiction: She talks of only 10 students. Kyambadde Enoch, the Deputy H/M who actually drove them from school and ensured that each had a voter’s card before leaving the school compound says he drove 20 students. Why are they lying? I reject their evidence and I believe the Senyondo’s for that reason. I find that students from Greenville were ferried to vote at Takkajunge. They were over 60”. According to counsel for the appellants, the above findings were unjustified from the circumstances of the case because the affidavit of Nakiwala Prossy was not controverted. Issuing Voters Cards by Namutebi Joyce: Kawuma Abaas, an alleged election monitor the respondent claims Namutebi Joyce, campaign agent of the 2nd appellant, was found distributing voters cards at the polling station. This allegation is supported by evidence of Mukasa Elisa Nkoyoyo and Ssekatawa Robert. Counsel contend that in rebuttal, Namutebi Joyce swore an affidavit explaining that from the five cards one was for her, and the other 4 were for her children which she was keeping for safe custody. According to counsel, the learned trial judge was in error and unfair to reject Namutebi’s evidence wholesomely. Counsel contend further that the Police