Previous 6 / 115 Next

15 Medios de impugnación locales en contra de las medidas cautelares. Con motivo de la determinación adoptada por la Comisión de Quejas y Denuncias, los días diecisiete y dieciocho de mayo, Santos Cruz Martínez, Carlos Quevedo Fabián, Yair Hernández Quiroz, por su propio derecho y Humberto Ferrusca Pérez, éste último en representación del Partido Nueva Alianza, promovieron ante el Tribunal Local sendos juicios ciudadanos identificados con número de expediente JDC-118/2018, JDC119/2018, JDC-220-2018, así como un recurso de apelación identificado con la clave RA/44/2018, al considerar que las medidas cautelares dictadas por la responsable fueron violatorias de sus derechos político-electorales. 16 Facultad de atracción SUP-SFA-50/2018. El diecinueve de mayo, esta Sala Superior determinó como procedente el ejercicio de la facultad de atracción solicitado por Berenice Fabián Sánchez y Evic Julián Estrada, ordenando la integración y el turno correspondiente. 17 Escrito de amicus curiae. El diecinueve de mayo, se recibió en la Oficialía de Partes de esta Sala Superior, escrito de comparecencia como amicus curiae suscrito por Amaranta Gómez Regalado, en su calidad de integrante de la comunidad muxe en el estado de Oaxaca. 18 Declinación de competencia del Tribunal local de los juicios JDC-118/2018, JDC-119/2018, JDC-220-2018 y del recurso RA/44/2018. Mediante acuerdos plenarios dictados el dieciocho y el veintiuno de mayo, el Tribunal local acordó la declinación de la competencia para conocer de los medios de impugnación, por lo que ordenó remitir a este órgano jurisdiccional las constancias de los expedientes integrados, para los efectos legales conducentes. 19 Asuntos Generales SUP-AG-60 y 62 de 2018. El veintinueve de mayo siguiente, esta Sala Superior acordó, en los Asuntos Generales 60 y 62 del presente año, asumir competencia respecto de los medios de impugnación promovidos para controvertir el registro de las candidaturas y las medidas cautelares, ambos dictados por el Instituto Local y ordenó el reencauzamiento de las demandas a tres juicios ciudadanos para la protección de los derechos político-electorales y dos juicios de revisión constitucional electoral, para el trámite correspondiente. Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Mexico SUP JDC 304 2018

Judgment

Question Presented: The High Chamber of the confirmed the validity of the candidacy of two transgender people (muxes in the state of Oaxaca) to occupy public posts reserved for women and revoked the registration of 15 male candidates.

Alleged Acts: On April, 2018, the Institute for Elections and Citizen Participation of Oaxaca (IEEPCO) approved to register 19 people who were self-identified as muxes or transgender, as female candidates for legislative and municipal offices within the gender quotas for women . However, the muxe community of Oaxaca considered that, out of the 19 candidacies, 17 of them were fraudulent since they were only pretending to be transgender. Based on these arguments, members of the muxe community filed a complaint with IEEPCO, against these 17 candidacies. The IEEPCO analyzed the arguments of the claim and, after obtaining some evidence on the gender identity with which these 17 candidates conducted themselves socially, opted to cancel the registration, considering that there were irregularities and that, in its opinion, they were men who had self-identified as transgender women .

Summary: In the ruling SUP-JDC-304/2018 and accumulated dated June 21, 2018, the High Chamber defined two determinant issues: the requirements that the State can demand to any person in order to: 1) prove their gender identity and 2) to access to gender quotas in electoral matters and the measures that the authorities can (and should) adopt to verify the gender identity of a person in order to avoid the fraudulent use of gender quotas. The High Chamber ruled that it is enough to inform the respective authority the gender self-identification with a manifestation that clearly indicates the intent of the person in question. They reached this conclusion for two reasons: due to the application of the principle of progressiveness and to provide the principle of parity or substantive equality a useful and non-discriminatory effect. First, the High Chamber considered that, in accordance with the provisions of articles 1st; 4th; 35th, section II; and, 41th, fourth paragraph of the Constitution, all authorities in Mexico, within the scope of their authority, have the obligation to protect and guarantee human rights, which include legal gender equality, the right to stand for election, and the prohibition of the discrimination of a person due to their gender.

Conclusion: The Electoral Tribunal realized that, as the muxe community had stated, 15 of those 17 candidates had tried to register first as men, but not getting the registration because the male gender quota was already covered, they decided to self-identify as transgender women. For this reason, the High Chamber considered that these 15 applications were contradictory with the second manifestation of self-identification arising from the request made by the IEEPCO. Therefore, independently of the express manifestation of these 15 people self-identifying to the transsexual gender, the High Chamber ordered the cancellation of the registration of these candidacies and ordered to replace them with 15 women.

Legal Issue(s)

Candidate Registration
Gender
Quotas

Region: Americas

Country: Mexico

Language of Decision

Spanish

Court: Electoral Court

Election Type: General

Date of decision: Jun 21, 2018

Geolocation

Latitude: 19.433186441267804

Longitude: -99.13401777615888

: Geolocation

Primary Documents

Mexico- SUP-JDC-304-2018.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Election Judgments - IFES

Select target paragraph3

Mexico SUP JDC 304 2018

Primary Documents

Notifications