49 hours the office is opened. A copy of each roll may be kept at such other places as the Commission may designate for public inspection." Section 3.7 of the New Elections Law states that "No registration roll or other election shall be invalidated on the ground that it is not printed or because of any error made in the copying or printing thereof." Section 4.2(la) of the New Elections Law states that the "Commission shall determine and publish the location of Polling Places to serve the voting precincts. The location of a polling place may be changed by the Commission if it determines that it is necessary. The Commission shall post signs showing the new location at least a week before the start of polling, unless the change is caused by an emergency in which case signs for the new location shall be posted as soon as possible." Section 4.7(1) of the New Elections Law states that "Ballot Papers shall be in a form to be prescribed by the Commission, who shall arrange to print and issue them for the polls." Section] 4.7(2) states that the "Ballot Papers shall include the names of candidates in alphabetical order of surname, the name of the party, and selected emblem. Different coloured ballots may be provided for elections to differed elective offices." Guided by the foregoing laws and controlling standard, we will revert to the record in these proceedings to ascertain whether the Hearing Officer's ruling comports with the controlling law and standard, APPELLANTS' ALLEGATION CONCERNING SERIAL NUMBER Appellants stated that serial numbers were placed on the ballots used during the 2005 and 2011 presidential and representative elections, and alleged that, the Appellee in these proceedings, intending to cheat, did not place serial number on the ballots used during the 2017 elections. We note that Section 4.7(1) of the New Elections Law states that "Ballot Papers shall be in a form to be prescribed by the Commission, who shall arrange to print and issue them for the polls," and Section 4.7(2) states that "The Ballot Papers shall include the names of candidates in alphabetical order of surname, the name of the party, and selected emblem. Different coloured ballots may be provided for elections to differed, elective offices." Section 4.7(1&2) do not require that serial numbers be on the ballot, and appellants did not allege so. Appellants only argument here is that the ballots Used in the 2005 and 2011 elections had serial numbers. In response, Mr. C. A. Lamin Lighe, testifying for Appellants as a subpoenaed witness, stated that the ballots Used during the October 10, 2017 elections had serial numbers on the stub. The record shows that ballot stubs containing serial numbers from the presidential and representative ballots wer4 introduced into evidence. Appellants do not dispute that the October 10, 017 ballot stubs have serial numbers, The record further shows that witness Lighe testified that while serial numbers can be placed on the ballot stubs for, administrative purposes, it would be a violation of a voters' secrecy to place serial numbers on the ballot papers that are used by voters, as doing so wo Id allow others to take the marked ballots and trace it to particular voters. Accordingly, we hold that the Hearing Officer did not err. APPELLANTS' ALLEGATION CONCERNING THE FRR Appellants alleged that the FRR was not published as required by law; that there are multiple registration rolls; and that two flash drives analyzed by one of its witness showed that there are discrepancies. In response, witness Lighe