69 Appellants/Intervenor excepted and argued the issue before the NEC Board. 16. That further to the exception described in Count Fifteen (15) above, the NEC Board totally ignored the oral testimony, video recording and 182 ballots presented before the CDHO and the effect which this evidence had on the fairness, freeness and transparency of the October 10, 2017 elections, And for this reason, Appellants/ Intervenors except. 17. Appellants/Intervenors adduced evidence that contrary to law Appellee adopted a regulation (Regulations on Polling and Counting of May 6, 2016, Art. 3.2), which provides that if the name of a person with a voter registration card could not be found on the FRR where he appears to vote, the presiding officer shall permit the person to vote if the person's voter registration card is verified through the SMS verification system managed by Appellee. In his Final Ruling, the CDHO did not pass on the effectiveness of this regulation, as it is contrary to law, and how this SMS verification system impacted the October 10, 2017 elections. And so Appellants excepted and argued the issue before the NEC Board; but the NEC Board totally ignore this specie for evidence and the effect it had on the fairness, freeness and transparency of the October 10, 2017 elections. And so Appellants/ Intervenors except. 18. Appellants adduced evidence that after voter registration, which covered a period of several months, was completed, pursuant to Appellee's own Voter Registration Regulations of August 12, 2016, Arts. 9.1 &9.2, Appellee printed a Provisional Registration Roll (PRR) separately for each registration center, exhibited it for public inspection and announced that 1.1 million persons had registered to vote. However when hundreds of registrants protested on the first day of the exhibition that their names could not be found on the PRR, Appellee closed down the exhibition on the second day when the exhibition should have been for a full week. The next time that Appellee informed the public about voter registration is a week after the abrupt closure of the exhibition and this time Appellee announced that 2.2 million persons had registered to vote. This information being statistically and practically impossible leads any reasonable person to the belief that the number of registered voters had been inflated to allow for fraudulent voting and ballot stuffing. The CDHO did not comment on this material evidence in his Final Ruling. And so Appellants/Intervenors except and argued the issue before the NEC Board; but, like the CDHO, the NEC Board totally ignored this specie of evidence and the effect it had on the fairness, freeness and transparency of the October 10, 2011 elections. And so Appellants/Intervenors except. 19. Appellants/Intervenors adduced evidence that after the protests from hundreds of registrants that their names were not on the PRR, Appellee's Chairman, issued a Press Statement that anyone with a voter registration card, whether obtained legally or illegally, would be allowed to vote. In a Press Statement issued by one of Appellee's