Previous 64 / 123 Next

8/7/2020 SM-JIN-0035-2015 Por tanto, la señalada omisión no puede acarrear la nulidad de la votación recibida en la mencionada casilla. 4.8.3. La nulidad de votación de la casilla 450 C1 no es determinante para que exista cambio de ganador en la elección. Si bien ha procedido la anulación de la votación recibida en la casilla 450 C1, lo que implica que se realice la modificación del cómputo distrital correspondiente, ello no conlleva que exista un cambio de ganador, pues al deducir de dicho cómputo la votación anulada, no existe un cambio de ganador, según se evidencia en la siguiente tabla: Como puede verse, restando la votación anulada a los resultados asentados en el acta de cómputo distrital, el PRI sigue manteniendo el primer lugar. En ese sentido, procede realizar el análisis de las causales de nulidad de elección invocadas por el PAN, sobre la base de que el PRI obtuvo el triunfo conforme los resultados obtenidos en las casillas instaladas en el distrito. 4.9. Nulidad de elección. El partido actor pretende la invalidez de los comicios por violación a preceptos constitucionales, al considerar que el candidato del PRI realizó la erogación de cantidades que exceden el tope de gastos de campaña fijado por el INE. https://www.te.gob.mx/colecciones/sentencias/html/SM/2015/JIN/SM-JIN-00035-2015.htm 64/123

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

PAN v. PRI (SM JIN 0035 2015)

Judgment

Question Presented: Whether the Governor's presence and irregularities are sufficient to annul the election results.

Alleged Acts: The Governor of Aguascalientes posted photos on his personal Twitter account which was transitioned to the official webpage of the government. These photos included him traveling to polling stations with candidates. Further, the plaintiff alleges that the elections should be annulled because of errors and inconsistencies in the minutes, voter were not received by authorized individuals, the polling station did not open and close at the allotted times, and that violence and pressure was forced upon voters at the ballot boxes. Lastly, the plaintiff indicates that the campaign financing was constructed in a way where the expenditures exceeded the maximum amount.

Summary: The court determined that the ballot box originating in Aguascalientes, ballot box 450 C1, was null for violating Article 75, paragraph 1, subsection (e) of the Media Law. The court determined that violation involving the elections must be substantial and of sufficient gravity that it would prevent certainty and validity as to which candidate would be ranked first. The court determined that the candidate did not exceed the campaign spending cap and that unreported expenses were not sufficient to exceed that cap. However, the court determined that because people, other than those authorized, received the ballots, the votes from that polling place were invalid. This, in combination with the governor’s presence in the district as evidenced by his Twitter account, suggests a violation of impartiality.

Conclusion: The court annulled the election results from one polling station stating that the Governor violated the impartiality and equality of elections because his involvement in the election became public knowledge.

Legal Issue(s)

Disputing Results
Electoral Administration Irregularities
Electoral Integrity
Social Media

Region: Americas

Country: Mexico

Language of Decision

Spanish

Court: Electoral Court

Election Type: General

Date of decision: Aug 4, 2017

Geolocation

Latitude: 19.43318644

Longitude: -99.13401778

: Geolocation

Primary Documents

SM-JIN-0035-2015.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Election Judgments - IFES

Select target paragraph3

PAN v. PRI (SM JIN 0035 2015)

Primary Documents

Notifications