Previous 14 / 123 Next

8/7/2020 SM-JIN-0035-2015 Al ingresar al vínculo correspondiente, es posible acceder a las imágenes que se muestran en la cuenta de dicho funcionario, siendo las relativas al día siete de junio la siguiente: Si bien es cierto, este tribunal ha establecido que la información que se difunde a través de redes sociales como Facebook o Twitter no constituye propaganda electoral, pues a través de esos medios no es posible que se dé una difusión automática de los datos —atendiendo a que involucra la intención de allegarse de la información, según lo plasmado líneas arriba—21, también ha sostenido que un mensaje en dichas redes puede constituir propaganda si se vincula a otros elementos propagandísticos, de modo que sea posible advertir que tuvo una difusión inducida de manera activa22. De tal suerte, si la cuenta de Twitter del gobernador se promociona a través de la página oficial del gobierno del estado de Aguascalientes, es claro que los menajes que emite el citado funcionario a través de la aludida red social son objeto de una promoción por medio del portal del gobierno, que es uno de los instrumentos con que la administración pública de esa entidad federativa cuenta para ponerse en contacto con la ciudadanía. Esto es, en la página del gobierno https://www.te.gob.mx/colecciones/sentencias/html/SM/2015/JIN/SM-JIN-00035-2015.htm 14/123

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

PAN v. PRI (SM JIN 0035 2015)

Judgment

Question Presented: Whether the Governor's presence and irregularities are sufficient to annul the election results.

Alleged Acts: The Governor of Aguascalientes posted photos on his personal Twitter account which was transitioned to the official webpage of the government. These photos included him traveling to polling stations with candidates. Further, the plaintiff alleges that the elections should be annulled because of errors and inconsistencies in the minutes, voter were not received by authorized individuals, the polling station did not open and close at the allotted times, and that violence and pressure was forced upon voters at the ballot boxes. Lastly, the plaintiff indicates that the campaign financing was constructed in a way where the expenditures exceeded the maximum amount.

Summary: The court determined that the ballot box originating in Aguascalientes, ballot box 450 C1, was null for violating Article 75, paragraph 1, subsection (e) of the Media Law. The court determined that violation involving the elections must be substantial and of sufficient gravity that it would prevent certainty and validity as to which candidate would be ranked first. The court determined that the candidate did not exceed the campaign spending cap and that unreported expenses were not sufficient to exceed that cap. However, the court determined that because people, other than those authorized, received the ballots, the votes from that polling place were invalid. This, in combination with the governor’s presence in the district as evidenced by his Twitter account, suggests a violation of impartiality.

Conclusion: The court annulled the election results from one polling station stating that the Governor violated the impartiality and equality of elections because his involvement in the election became public knowledge.

Legal Issue(s)

Disputing Results
Electoral Administration Irregularities
Electoral Integrity
Social Media

Region: Americas

Country: Mexico

Language of Decision

Spanish

Court: Electoral Court

Election Type: General

Date of decision: Aug 4, 2017

Geolocation

Latitude: 19.43318644

Longitude: -99.13401778

: Geolocation

Primary Documents

SM-JIN-0035-2015.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Election Judgments - IFES

Select target paragraph3

PAN v. PRI (SM JIN 0035 2015)

Primary Documents

Notifications