Principle 1: Prompt Investigation the evidence and the reliability of witnesses has been assessed on objective indicators or factors; k) Whether any consideration should be given to the possible effect on the personal circumstances of anyone connected to the investigation; l) Whether the inherent operational expenses associated with a more selective or comprehensive investigative approach (referral to other investigative agencies) to the various categories of expenses would be warranted and justified under the circumstances; [and] m) Public interest factors, including: i. The circumstances, the views, the reliability and credibility of the complainant and the specificity of the allegation raised; ii. The need to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice and the integrity and fairness of the electoral process; iii. The prevalence of the type of offense and any related need for a generic or specific deterrence…; iv. The staleness of the alleged offense or likely length and expense of an investigation…; [and] v. The availability and efficacy of any alternatives to investigation, such as administrative remedies and voluntary compliance measures by the alleged offender. From Canadian Special Investigators’ Manual, Ch. 4 (p. 3–5). Ensuring an Efficient Investigation Investigation Planning An investigation plan helps guide the implementation of an investigation and enables investigative bodies to develop strategies for managing operations and coordinating with other bodies.80 Establishing an investigation plan adds 80 U.N. Office on Drugs & Crime, U.N. Handbook on Practical Anti-Corruption Measures for Prosecutors and Investigators 38 (2004) [hereinafter U.N. Handbook on Practical Anti-Corruption Measures for Prosecutors and Investigators]. 47