11. In the assessment of the Supreme Court, the complaint of H. Põlluaas is not timely. Technical impediments which do not allow the voter to vote for a specific candidate violate that candidate’s right to candidate provided in § 60(2) of the Constitution. The complaint of H. Põlluaas has been filed against the activity of the National Electoral Committee regarding the e-elections from 24 February 2011 to 2 March 2011 because due to technical problems, it was not possible to cast a vote in favour of H. Põlluaas during the e-voting. Acts performed and resolutions adopted during e-voting may be contested prior to adoption of resolutions on final voting results. Pursuant to § 38(1) of the CRCPA, a complaint against a resolution of the National Electoral Committee shall be filed within three days as of the resolution or act of the National Electoral Committee being announced or performed. It appears from the complaint of H. Põlluaas that he became aware of the possible violation of his right to candidate on 25 February 2011. The term for filing a complaint against the activity of the National Electoral Committee began at the latest on 2 March 2011 when the final response to the letters of H. Põlluaas and A. Silma was delivered from the National Electoral Committee's e-voting project manager Tarvi Martens. The three-day term for filing a complaint was therefore expired by 9 March 2011. Therefore, the complaint of H. Põlluaas shall be returned without review based on § 40(2) of the CRCPA. 12. The Chamber adds that upon organising e-voting, it is the state's responsibility to ensure the compatibility of the software used in elections with the most common hardware, operating systems, screen resolutions or fonts. However, achieving such compatibility may be complicated in isolated cases. In case of problems, the voter has the possibility to seek advice from the e-voting technical support. If the technical problems arising during e-voting cannot be eliminated in isolated cases, the voter has the possibility to vote by means of a ballot paper. Märt Rask, Jüri Põld, Harri Salmann Source URL: https://www.riigikohus.ee/en/constitutional-judgment-3-4-1-6-11#comment-0

Select target paragraph3