would be too cumbersome for their office to investigate each and every form
that may have been missing some information. Mangan Dep. Tr. 81:7-83:7.
xiii.
The COPP has received Registry Forms that have been tumed in blank or filled
out by fictional characters but has not investigated any of these occurrences.
See Mangan Dep.
Tr. 86:9-87: 1 8;
87:2 1 -90: 1 8; 9 1 :1 -92:20; 126:4-127 -20;
Pl.
Exs. 49, 50, 5 1, 52.
xiv.
The Attomey General's office could also prosecute violations of BIPA but has
determined it will leave prosecutions up to the County Attomeys, even if there
is uneven enforcement of BIPA. AG Dep. Tr. 88:11-89:9.
xv.
The Attorney General acknowledges the risks of inconsistent enforcement but
has not issued any guidelines or directives for enforcement of BIPA. AG Dep.
Tr.
e.
88:
1
1-89:9.
$500 fine.
i.
Violation of BIPA is subject to "a fine of $500 for each ballot unlawfully
collected." Mont. Code Arur. $ 13-35-705; see also
09108120
Trial Tr.
(Mclean) ar 50:3-24.
ii. The statute fails to delineate whether this penalty is civil or criminal in nature.
Mont. Code Ann. $ 13-35-705;see also Mangan Dep. Tr.70:1-5.
iii.
No document produced by the offices of the Secretary of State or Political
Practices provides any guidance on whether the penalty is
09110120
civil or criminal.
Trial Tr. (Corson) at 472:18-474:16; Mangan Dep. Tr. 70:1-5, 70: 13-
18, 124:8-22; see also CookDep. Tr.34:22-35:5; 35:8-9.
35