would be too cumbersome for their office to investigate each and every form that may have been missing some information. Mangan Dep. Tr. 81:7-83:7. xiii. The COPP has received Registry Forms that have been tumed in blank or filled out by fictional characters but has not investigated any of these occurrences. See Mangan Dep. Tr. 86:9-87: 1 8; 87:2 1 -90: 1 8; 9 1 :1 -92:20; 126:4-127 -20; Pl. Exs. 49, 50, 5 1, 52. xiv. The Attomey General's office could also prosecute violations of BIPA but has determined it will leave prosecutions up to the County Attomeys, even if there is uneven enforcement of BIPA. AG Dep. Tr. 88:11-89:9. xv. The Attorney General acknowledges the risks of inconsistent enforcement but has not issued any guidelines or directives for enforcement of BIPA. AG Dep. Tr. e. 88: 1 1-89:9. $500 fine. i. Violation of BIPA is subject to "a fine of $500 for each ballot unlawfully collected." Mont. Code Arur. $ 13-35-705; see also 09108120 Trial Tr. (Mclean) ar 50:3-24. ii. The statute fails to delineate whether this penalty is civil or criminal in nature. Mont. Code Ann. $ 13-35-705;see also Mangan Dep. Tr.70:1-5. iii. No document produced by the offices of the Secretary of State or Political Practices provides any guidance on whether the penalty is 09110120 civil or criminal. Trial Tr. (Corson) at 472:18-474:16; Mangan Dep. Tr. 70:1-5, 70: 13- 18, 124:8-22; see also CookDep. Tr.34:22-35:5; 35:8-9. 35

Select target paragraph3