Previous 5 / 136 Next

Lo anterior, al tratarse de recursos de apelación y juicios para la protección de los derechos político-electorales del ciudadano, interpuestos para controvertir la resolución de un órgano central del Instituto Nacional Electoral, como es el Consejo General[3], mediante la cual se determinan los criterios aplicables para el registro de candidaturas a los distintos cargos de elección popular que presenten los partidos políticos y, en su caso las coaliciones, ante los Consejos del Instituto Nacional Electoral, para el proceso electoral federal 2017-2018. 2. Acumulación Del análisis de los escritos de demanda que motivaron la integración de los expedientes identificados al rubro, se advierte que existe identidad en el acto impugnado y autoridad responsable, por lo que hay conexidad en la causa. En efecto, en los dieciséis casos se controvierte la resolución INE/CG508/2017, de ocho de noviembre del año en curso, emitida por el Consejo General. Consecuentemente, con fundamento en los artículos 199, fracción XI, de la Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial de la Federación, 31 de la Ley General de Medios, y 79 del Reglamento Interno del Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación, se decreta la acumulación de los expedientes SUP-RAP-730/2017, SUP-RAP-739/2017, SUP-RAP741/2017, SUP-JDC-1049/2017, SUP-JDC-1050/2017, SUP-JDC-1051/2017, SUP-JDC-1063/2017, SUP-JDC- 1067/2017, SUP-JDC-1086/2017, SUP-JDC-1090/2017, SUP-JDC-1091/2017, SUP-JDC-1092/2017, SUP-JDC- 1093/2017, SUP-JDC-1094/2017, SUP-JDC-1095/2017, SUP-JDC-1099/2017, SUP-JDC-1110/2017, SUP-JDC- 1114/2017 al diverso SUP-RAP-726/2017, dado que éste fue el primero en recibirse en esta instancia jurisdiccional. En consecuencia, se deberá glosar copia certificada de los puntos resolutivos de la presente ejecutoria, a los autos de los expedientes acumulados. 3. Sobreseimiento Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

SUP RAP 726 2017

Judgment

Question Presented: Political parties and coalitions must register indigenous peoples´ representatives as candidates in at least 13 electoral districts

Summary: The High Chamber of the TEPJF modified the agreement of the INE which established the criteria applicable to the registration of candidates for the various elected offices submitted by political parties and, where appropriate, coalitions, for the Federal Electoral Process 2017-2018, strengthening measures in favor of the indigenous population, by increasing the number of electoral districts where only indigenous persons should be nominated to 13. The Court ruled that the specific design of the measure was not the most appropriate to fully meet its purpose and increase the participation of indigenous people, as it allowed for the existence of indigenous and non-indigenous participation scenarios within the same district, which could limit the effectiveness of affirmative action. The High Chamber amended the INE agreement to ensure that political parties nominated only indigenous candidates in 13 districts where there is an indigenous concentration of more than 60 per cent of the total population. The 13 indigenous persons nominated could not be of the same gender in more than 7 districts.

Conclusion: The High Chamber modified the agreement issued by the General Council of the INE in order to strengthen affirmative actions aimed at achieving efficient indigenous representation.

Legal Issue(s)

Quotas

Applicable Law(s): INE/CG508/2017 agreement of the General Council of the National Electoral Institute (INE)

Region: Americas

Country: Mexico

Language of Decision

Spanish

Court: Supreme Court

Election Type: General

Date of decision: Dec 14, 2017

Geolocation

Latitude: 19.43318644

Longitude: -99.13401778

: Geolocation

Primary Documents

Mexico- SUP-RAP-726-2017.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Election Judgments - IFES

Select target paragraph3

SUP RAP 726 2017

Primary Documents

Notifications