Previous 15 / 136 Next

constancia que acredite una específica de notificación ni la autoridad responsable hace pronunciamiento al respecto en el informe circunstanciado. Por otra parte, atinente a los diversos medios de impugnación SUP-JDC-1092/2017, SUP-JDC-1093/2017, SUP-JDC1094/2017, SUP-JDC-1095/2017, SUP-JDC-1099/2017 y SUP-JDC-1110/2017, la responsable en el informe circunstanciado reconoce y tiene por ciertas las fechas en que los promoventes aducen tuvieron conocimiento del acuerdo impugnado, por tanto, se estima que también son oportunos de conformidad con el cuadro siguiente: Medio de impugnación Tuvo conocimiento Presentó demanda SUP-JDC-1090/2017 17-noviembre 21-noviembre SUP-JDC-1091/2017 SUP-JDC-1092/2017 18-noviembre 18-noviembre 22-noviembre 22-noviembre SUP-JDC-1093/2017 18-noviembre 22-noviembre SUP-JDC-1094/2017 13-noviembre 14-noviembre SUP-JDC-1095/2017 13-noviembre 16-noviembre SUP-JDC-1099/2017 SUP-JDC-1110/2017 SUP-JDC-1114/2017 Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API 19-noviembre 21-noviembre 23-noviembre 22-noviembre 24-noviembre 26-noviembre PDFCROWD

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

SUP RAP 726 2017

Judgment

Question Presented: Political parties and coalitions must register indigenous peoples´ representatives as candidates in at least 13 electoral districts

Summary: The High Chamber of the TEPJF modified the agreement of the INE which established the criteria applicable to the registration of candidates for the various elected offices submitted by political parties and, where appropriate, coalitions, for the Federal Electoral Process 2017-2018, strengthening measures in favor of the indigenous population, by increasing the number of electoral districts where only indigenous persons should be nominated to 13. The Court ruled that the specific design of the measure was not the most appropriate to fully meet its purpose and increase the participation of indigenous people, as it allowed for the existence of indigenous and non-indigenous participation scenarios within the same district, which could limit the effectiveness of affirmative action. The High Chamber amended the INE agreement to ensure that political parties nominated only indigenous candidates in 13 districts where there is an indigenous concentration of more than 60 per cent of the total population. The 13 indigenous persons nominated could not be of the same gender in more than 7 districts.

Conclusion: The High Chamber modified the agreement issued by the General Council of the INE in order to strengthen affirmative actions aimed at achieving efficient indigenous representation.

Legal Issue(s)

Quotas

Applicable Law(s): INE/CG508/2017 agreement of the General Council of the National Electoral Institute (INE)

Region: Americas

Country: Mexico

Language of Decision

Spanish

Court: Supreme Court

Election Type: General

Date of decision: Dec 14, 2017

Geolocation

Latitude: 19.43318644

Longitude: -99.13401778

: Geolocation

Primary Documents

Mexico- SUP-RAP-726-2017.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Election Judgments - IFES

Select target paragraph3

SUP RAP 726 2017

Primary Documents

Notifications