ŽDANOKA v. LATVIA JUDGMENT 45 4. Holds, unanimously, that it is not necessary to examine separately the applicant’s complaints under Article 10 of the Convention. Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 16 March 2006. Lawrence Early Deputy Registrar Luzius Wildhaber President In accordance with Article 45 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 74 § 2 of the Rules of Court, the following separate opinions are annexed to this judgment: (a) partly dissenting opinion of Judge Wildhaber; (b) partly dissenting opinion of Judges Spielmann and Jaeger; (c) dissenting opinion of Judge Rozakis; (d) dissenting opinion of Judge Zupančič; (e) joint dissenting opinion of Judges Mijović and Gyulumyan. L.W. T.L.E.