confidential relationships to senior public officers, when partisan
loyalty is a reasonably necessary element of the job. Id. The
distinction between ministerial public positions and those that involve
policy formulation is difficult, and has, in the past, been left by the
courts largely to a case-by-case analysis. Nevertheless, the distinction
is important in assessing the scope and purpose of federal criminal laws
addressing illegal patronage.
STATUTES
The text of the criminal statutes discussed in this section is
printed in Appendix B. Each of these statutes carries, in addition to the
prison term noted, fines under 18 U.S.C. § 3571.
1. Limitations Based on Federal Employment or
Workspace
(a) Solicitation of political contributions: 18 U.S.C.
§ 602
Section 602 prohibits a United States Senator or
Representative, a candidate for Congress, officer or employee of the
United States, or person receiving compensation for services from the
United States Treasury, from knowingly soliciting any contribution
from any other such officer, employee, or person, except as permitted
under the 1993 Hatch Act amendments. The statute applies only to
contributions made to influence a federal election. Violations are
punishable by imprisonment for up to three years.
Section 602 has been interpreted by the courts as
criminalizing aggravated forms of political “shakedowns.” United
States v. Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 396, 398 (1930) (statute prohibits
exerting “pressure for money for political purpose”); Ex parte Curtis,106
U.S. 371, 374 (1882) (statute protects federal employees against
political “extractions through fear of personal loss”); see also Brehm v.
United States, 196 F.2d 769, 770 (D.C. Cir. 1952); United States v.
Burleson, 127 F. Supp. 400, 402 (E.D. Tenn. 1954).
101
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents