30 Official Gazette – Issue No. 9 (bis) March 1, 2015 and carry the legal responsibility of such. This estimate is based on objective grounds and aims at legal unobjectionable objectives. The implementation of such procedure falls on individuals of legal status who should not exceed their requests. Therefore, deploring the contravening of such text to the principle of equality by plaintiffs should be disregarded and, since such appeal does not contradict any other text in the Constitution, the Court should reject the case and dismiss it. Given the aforementioned reasons, the following was decided: The Court has ruled that the action be dismissed, bail confiscated, legal action fees collected from the plaintiff, along with attorney fees of EGP 200. Secretary First Vice-President of Court