44 ‘constitute Tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court”. Yet, even this ‘Supreme Court’ was given rather few constitutional tools to keep its underlings in line. (Ibid) Article III thus offered the Federal Judiciary a uniquely protective package. “Good Behaviour” now meant what it said: A Federal Judge could be ousted from office only if he misbehaved, with adjudication of misbehavior taking place in a judicial forum.(Ibid) In respect of Indian constitution, it is necessary to look into its legal Frame Work, that is to say, what were the objects which the Framers of the Constitution set out to achieve in their Draft Constitution? What were the models to which they turned? What were the pitfalls they tried to avoid? Dr. Ambedkar, the Chairman of the drafting committee, answered some of these questions when he moved that the Constituent Assembly should take the Draft Constitution into consideration. Indian constitution adopted the system of parliamentary form in preference to the presidential system adopted in the