84 Ekushey Television V. Dr. Chowdhury Mahmud Hasan, 54 DLR (AD) 130; Anwar Hossain Chowdhury V. Bangladesh, BLD (spl) 1; M. Saleemullah V. Bangladesh, 2005 BLD 195 and held that the horizon of judicial review is being expanded passage of through time judicial facilitating activism citizens with access the to justice; that a great duty is cast upon the lawyers for onward march of our constitutional journey to the desired destination; that the writ petitioners are very much concerned with the independence of the judiciary, inasmuch as, they are the stakeholders in the administration of justice without hindrance; that the concern expressed by the writ petitioners about the independence of higher judiciary and separation of powers among the three organs of the State is a public concern. I fully endorse the views expressed by the majority of the High Court Division and with a view to avoiding repetition, I have refrained from making any further opinion supplementing those of the High Court Division. On the question of judicial accountability, the High Court Division has relied upon the Commonwealth