149 judicial verdict and observed that in doing so; the court can modify or even dismantle a legislation in the interest of justice. The court in such circumstances did not subscribe to the notions that all acts of the usurpers are illegal and illegitimate. The court took into consideration of the acts, things, legislative actions which are useful or which acts, things, deeds tend to advance or promote the need of the people or all acts, things and deeds ordinary things, which are functioning deeds and required to of State the legislative be done or matters for the the acts, which would augment the independence of judiciary and welfare of the people etc. This had been done in Pakistan as well as in Bangladesh. Therefore, we are unable to accept the emotional submission of the learned Attorney General regarding non-retention of a provision of a martial law regime in the constitution. In the Fifth Amendment case, this court approved clauses (2), (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) of article 96