8/26/2020
Jupica vs Nec – Supreme Court of Liberia
But assuming that they were exercising judicial or quasi-judicial powers, we hold that they did not
exceed their jurisdiction or proceed by wrong rules other than those which should be observed at all
times, because they were specifically mandated by the Joint Resolution of the Legislature to
conduct the special senatorial election on a specified date which is December 16, 2014. Hence,
prohibition will not lie against them.
WHEREFORE, the alternative writ of prohibition issued is ordered quashed, the stay order placed on
the holding of the special senatorial elections lifted, and the peremptory writ prayed for is denied.
The Clerk of this Court is ordered to inform the parties accordingly. It is so ordered.
Petition denied.
Counselors Sayma Syrenius Cephus appeared for petitioners, Justice and Public Interest Consortium
Africa (JUPICA), Honorable Edwin K. Martin, the Concerned Group of Eminent Citizens, the
Movement for Progressive Change (MPC), Leaders of Political Parties and Civil Society Organization
(CGEC).
Counselor J. Laveli Supuwood of the Supuwood & Associates Law Firm in association with S.L. Lofen
Kaneah, Jr. appeared for Petitioners National Democratic Coalition (NDC) and the Movement for
Progressive Change (MPC).
Counselor Theophilus C. Gould of the Kemp & Associates, Counselor F. Musa Dean of the Dean &
Associates and Counselor George E. Henries of the Henries Law Firm appeared for 1st Respondent,
National Elections Commission (NEC).
Counselor Benedict F. Sannoh, Acting Minister of Justice and Counselor Betty Lamin Blamo,
Solicitor-General appeared for 2nd Respondent Government of Liberia.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE...
0
Mustapha Fadallah VS
Priscilla Gibson-Flomo
Subah-Belleh & Associates,
Inc. VS Nelson Oniyama
25 JAN, 2016
1 FEB, 2016
Hans Caperhat Williams and
Mardia P. Williams VS
Republic of Liberia
25 JAN, 2016
comnetitsolutionsinc.org/toj/jupica-vs-nec-2/
26/27