Previous 100 / 109 Next

SUP-REP-542/2015 Y ACUMULADO VOTO PARTICULAR QUE, CON FUNDAMENTO EN EL ÚLTIMO PÁRRAFO DEL ARTÍCULO 187, DE LA LEY ORGÁNICA DEL PODER JUDICIAL DE LA FEDERACIÓN, EMITE EL MAGISTRADO FLAVIO GALVÁN RIVERA, RESPECTO DE LA SENTENCIA DICTADA AL RESOLVER LOS RECURSOS PROCEDIMIENTO ACUMULADOS ESPECIAL DE REVISIÓN DEL SANCIONADOR IDENTIFICADOS CON LAS CLAVES DE EXPEDIENTE SUPREP-542/2015 Y SUP-REP-544/2015. Porque el suscrito no coincide con las razones de hecho y de Derecho que sustentan el criterio postulado por la mayoría de los Magistrados integrantes de esta Sala Superior, al dictar sentencia para resolver, de manera acumulada, los recursos de revisión del procedimiento especial sancionador identificados con las claves de expediente SUP-REP-542/2015 y SUP-REP544/2015, promovidos por los partidos políticos Verde Ecologista de México y Acción Nacional, respectivamente, en el sentido de revocar la resolución emitida por la Sala Regional Especializada de este Tribunal Electoral, al resolver el procedimiento especial sancionador identificado con la clave de expediente SRE-PSC251/2015, formula VOTO PARTICULAR, en los términos siguientes: Al respecto, se debe precisar que el procedimiento especial sancionador se instauró con motivo de las denuncias presentadas por los partidos políticos nacionales MORENA y Acción Nacional y por Javier Corral Jurado, por la presunta 100

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

MOREA v. Party of Institutional Revolutionary (SUP 2015 REP 544 499367)

Judgment

Question Presented: Whether the dissemination of campaign materials on twitter accounts of candidate and alternate candidates violate the electoral silence laws?

Alleged Acts: Several candidates and alternate candidates, including Raul Osorio Alonzo and Arto Escobar y Vega, dissemination campaign information on their Twitter accounts in an official capacity. In particular, Raul Osorio Alonzo’s posts included links to political parties, but Arto Escobar y Vega’s posts did not include links of calls to vote.

Summary: The court stated that all candidates and alternate candidates have the duty to adjust their social media posts to the letter of the Constitution. The parties argued that they themselves sought to disengage in the election campaign during the mandated silence period, but the court stated that the political party was also tasked with monitoring its members. The court found that the political party did not sufficient inhibit of denounce the behavior and thus could not be exempt from liability. However, actions of members may be exempt from political party liability instances where the political party has sufficiently discouraged the actions taken because this will not necessarily impact the integrity of the election results.

Conclusion: The court ultimately revoked the prior judgment and permitted the responsible authority to use a new one against the Green Ecologist Party for its failure to monitor candidates making political statements during the electoral silence period.

Legal Issue(s)

Electoral Integrity
Social Media

Region: Americas

Country: Mexico

Language of Decision

Spanish

Court: Electoral Court

Election Type: General

Date of decision: Apr 20, 2016

Geolocation

Latitude: 19.43318644

Longitude: -99.13401778

: Geolocation

Primary Documents

SUP-REP-0542-2015.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Election Judgments - IFES

Select target paragraph3

MOREA v. Party of Institutional Revolutionary (SUP 2015 REP 544 499367)

Primary Documents

Notifications