17 Election Commission’s own information, and requested him to collect those statements of accounts directly from the political parties concern (Annexure-B). Being aggrieved by the same, the petitioner No.1 on 04.08.2013 preferred an appeal (Annexure-C) to the Secretary of the Election Commission, who by Memo No. 17.00.0000.040.22.001.10149 dated 03.09.2013, affirmed the said decision dated 14.07.2013 given by the designated Officer (RTI) (Annexure-D). Being aggrieved thereto, the petitioner No.1 filed a complaint before the respondent No.1-Information Commission under section 25 of the RTI Act, 2009 on 09.09.2013 (Annexure-E), which was registered as Complaint No. 97/2013. Upon hearing the same, the respondent No.1 decided the matter on 22.10.2013 holding that the information requested involved a “third-party” and that the disclosure of such information was not possible without the opinion of the “third-party” (Annexure-G), which runs as followsÒ abÉ L¢jne cÖZZ œ Ë¡ feb (3u am¡) Hg-4/H, BN¡lN¡yJ fËn¡p¢eL Hm¡L¡ −n−l-h¡wm¡ eNl, Y¡L¡-1207 A¢i−k¡N ew: 97/2013 A¢i−k¡NL¡l£x W. h¢cEm Bmj jS¤jc¡l ¢fa¡-l‰¤ ¢ju¡ jS¤jc¡l 12/2 CLh¡m ®l¡X, ®j¡q¡Çjcf¤l, XvKv| fË¢afrx Se¡h HpHj Bp¡c¤‹¡j¡e f¢lQ¡mL (Sepw−k¡N) J c¡¢uaÄfÊ¡ç LjÑLa¡Ñ (Bl¢VBC) h¡wm¡−cn ¢eh¡ÑQe L¢jne p¢Qh¡mu −n−l h¡wm¡ eNl, Y¡L¡z ¢pÜ¡¿¹fœ| (a¡¢lMx 22-10-2013 Cw) A¢i−k¡NL¡l£ W. h¢cEm Bmj jS¤jc¡l 12-06-2013 Zvwi‡L Z_¨ AwaKvi AvBb, 2009 Gi 8(1) aviv Abymv‡i h¡wm¡−cn ¢eh¡ÑQe L¢jne mwPevj‡qi f¢lQ¡jK