IDPs is a continuous process being undertaken by a body known as the National Consultative Coordination Committee on IDPS (NCCC) established under the Prevention, Protection and Assistance to Internally Displaced Persons and Affected Communities Act, 2012 and the funds alluded to were approved for disbursement by Parliament and not the 3rd respondent. Counsel further argued that there is no evidence that any of the beneficiaries were influenced by that payment to vote for the 3rd respondent. [73] In her affidavit, Winnie Guchu also refuted the claim that the 3rd respondent advertised Government projects. She instead stated that there is no provision in the Constitution that requires ongoing government programs to be suspended during the election period. And that because Article 35 of the Constitution guarantees the right to information, what is called advertisement is actually information made available to members of the public through the various available channels. In any case, that there are two pending cases in the High Court namely; Apollo Mboya v. Attorney- General & 3 Others16 and Jack Munialo & 12 Others v. Attorney- General and Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission, 17 challenging the constitutionality of Section 14 of the Election Offences Act and that therefore therein is the right forum for the petitioners to raise their complaints. 16  Apollo Mboya v. Attorney General & 3 Others, Petition No. 162 of 2017.   17  Jack Munialo & 12 Others v. Attorney-General and the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission, Petition 182 of 2017.   Presidential  Petition  No.  1  of  2017                                                                                                                                                                                                            29  |  P a g e