Search Tips
sorted by
Cards viewTable viewMap view
30 shown of 48 entities

SUP RAP 0042 2018

Country
Mexico
Legal Issue(s)
  • Electronic Voting
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Mar 22, 2018
Judgment

MOREA v. Party of Institutional Revolutionary (SUP 2015 REP 544 499367)

Country
Mexico
Question Presented
Whether the dissemination of campaign materials on twitter accounts of candidate and alternate candidates violate the electoral silence laws?
Legal Issue(s)
  • Electoral Integrity
  • Social Media
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Apr 20, 2016
Judgment

PAN v. PRI (SM JIN 0035 2015)

Country
Mexico
Question Presented
Whether the Governor's presence and irregularities are sufficient to annul the election results.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Disputing Results
  • Electoral Administration Irregularities
  • Electoral Integrity
  • Social Media
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Aug 4, 2017
Judgment

(Mexico) SUP 2020 REC 102 924628

Title
(Mexico) SUP 2020 REC 102 924628
Question Presented
Whether indigenous customs for men to elect political leaders outweigh the principles of non-discrimination, equality and gender parity, as well as the right of "every woman [...] to a life free of violence, both in the public and private spheres" and to "freely and fully exercise their political rights.”
Legal Issue(s)
  • Gender
  • Indigenous Persons
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Sep 15, 2020
Judgment

SUP-REP-16/2016 Y SUP-REP-22/2016 ACUMULADOS

Country
Mexico
Question Presented
Whether the Green Party of Mexico and various famous persons were rightfully sanctioned for alleged campaign violations.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Social Media
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Apr 20, 2016
Judgment

SUP RAP 726 2017

Country
Mexico
Question Presented
Political parties and coalitions must register indigenous peoples´ representatives as candidates in at least 13 electoral districts
Legal Issue(s)
  • Quotas
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Dec 14, 2017
Judgment

SUP RAP 0173 2018

Country
Mexico
Question Presented
The TEPJF instructs the INE to issue a new resolution on the registration of Jaime Heliodoro Rodríguez as an independent candidate to the Presidency of the Republic.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Candidate Registration
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Apr 9, 2018
Judgment

Mexico SUP JDC 304 2018

Country
Mexico
Question Presented
The High Chamber of the confirmed the validity of the candidacy of two transgender people (muxes in the state of Oaxaca) to occupy public posts reserved for women and revoked the registration of 15 male candidates.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Candidate Registration
  • Gender
  • Quotas
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Jun 21, 2018
Judgment

SUP RAP 0749 2017

Country
Mexico
Question Presented
The Electoral Tribunal considered that the pre-opening of ballot boxes for the identification of improperly deposited ballots by citizens on Election Day exceeds the attributions of the National Electoral Institute, and trespasses the principles of legislative power, legal certainty and safety, by modifying the scrutiny and count procedure, as well as of the transfer of electoral packages.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Vote Form Irregularities
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Feb 14, 2018
Judgment

In Re Case No. 9768, 9780 & 9828

Country
Mexico
Question Presented
Whether the elections violated the citizen’s political rights even though the domestic options were exhausted.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Electoral Integrity
  • EMB Independence
  • EMB Operation
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
May 17, 1990
Judgment

Institutional Revolutionary Party v. Andrés Manuel López Obrador (SUP RAP 0268 2012)

Country
Mexico
Question Presented
Whether Twitter posts and Youtube videos constitute campaign acts?
Legal Issue(s)
  • Social Media
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
May 24, 2012
Judgment

Institutional Revolutionary Party v. Miguel Angel Yunes Linares (SUP JRC 0168 2016)

Country
Mexico
Question Presented
Whether Facebook posts that indicate a political position, but do not solicit votes constitute pre-campaign activity.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Social Media
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Apr 25, 2016
Judgment

(Mexico) SCM JDC 0412 2021

Procedural history
Plaintiffs appealed to the Mexico City Regional Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judicial
Question Presented
Whether there is an obligation among political parties to comply with a candidate quota that included people from the LGBTQIA + community even though there was no legal order or law to do so.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Gender
  • Quotas
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Apr 3, 2021
Judgment

(Mexico) SM JDC 0167 2021

Title
(Mexico) SM JDC 0167 2021
Question Presented
Whether it was incorrect that the request for a citizen's trial that he filed in the initial instance was processed as a complaint, considering that this is the ideal way in which a favorable resolution could be obtained that guarantees the inclusion of members of the LGBTQIA+ community. Whether political parties are obligated to have a quota for candidates that identify as LGBTQIA+ to guarantee their inclusion in the political process.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Gender
  • Quotas
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Mar 31, 2021
Judgment

(Mexico) SX JE 0003 2021

Title
(Mexico) SX JE 0003 2021
Question Presented
Whether there were procedural irregularities in the lower court’s decision based on the timeliness of the complaint and lack of notice by the court. Whether evidence from Facebook and WhatsApp demonstrating gender based political violence were illegally obtained and possess the truth and veracity it asserts.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Gender
Country
Mexico
Language of Decision
  • Spanish
Date of decision
Jan 21, 2021
Judgment

Advocate Prem Chandra Rai vs Government of Nepal

Document contents
vote is sent to the home country through post. Countries like Canada, Norway, Mexico, and Switzerland seem to be using this method. The third method of giving
Question Presented
Whether Nepali citizens residing abroad should be given the opportunity to vote from the country in which they currently reside. Whether restricted voting rights on Nepali citizens living abroad violates the constitutional right to vote.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Accessibility
  • Elections as a Fundamental Right
  • Out of Country Voting
Country
Nepal
Language of Decision
  • Nepali
Date of decision
Mar 21, 2018
Judgment

Kham v. Electoral Commission

Document contents
for Sustainable Democracy), Elections Canada, INE (the National Electoral Institute of Mexico), IFES, The Carter Center, UNDESA, UNDP and the UNEAD (United Nations Electoral
Question Presented
Should elections be annulled when the IEC did not provide timely access to voter rolls to the petitioners before elections?
Legal Issue(s)
  • Disputing Results
  • Electoral Integrity
  • Voter Registration
Country
South Africa
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Nov 1, 2015
Judgment

Tanganyika Law Society v. Tanzania

Document contents
the decision in the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights; Castañeda Gutman v Mexico, Judgment of 6 August 2008 Series C No 184 to the effect that the
Question Presented
Whether the Tanzania regulation prohibiting independent candidates from seeking public office is unconstitutional?
Legal Issue(s)
  • Candidate Registration
  • Judicial Independence
Country
Tanzania. United Republic of
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Jun 14, 2019
Judgment

Chiafalo v. Washington

Document contents
has no connection to elector appointment. See ante, at 5. For example, New Mexico imposes a legal duty on its electors: “All presidential electors shall cast
Question Presented
Whether a pledge requirement and sanction violates the Electors Constitutional right to pledge electoral votes regardless of voter preference?
Legal Issue(s)
  • Elections as a Fundamental Right
Country
United States of America
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Jul 6, 2020
Judgment

Tennessee v. Lane

Document contents
F Reilly of Massachusetts, Jeremiah W. (Jay)Nixon of Missouri, PatriciaA Madrid of New Mexico, Eliot Spitzer of New York, William H. Sorrell of Vermont, Christine 0. Gregoire
Question Presented
Whether Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act validly abrogates state sovereign immunity under the 11th Amendment and whether people with disabilities have a right to access courts to lodge fundamental rights claims, including electoral disputes.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Elections as a Fundamental Right
Country
United States of America
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
May 17, 2004
Judgment

Shelby County v. Holder

Document contents
subject to federal preclearance by court orders, including the States of New Mexico and Arkansas. App. to Brief for Federal Respondent 1a–3a. This experience exposes
Question Presented
Whether the coverage formula in Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act — which determined which jurisdictions were subject to the preclearance requirement of Section 5 — remained constitutionally valid after Congress reauthorized it in 2006 without updating the formula, given that the formula was based on decades-old data (voter registration and turnout from the 1960s and early 1970s) and practices (literacy tests) that had since been banned nationwide. More broadly, whether the formula violated the constitutional principle of equal sovereignty among the states by subjecting only certain jurisdictions to the extraordinary federal intrusion of preclearance.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Elections as a Fundamental Right
  • Electoral Administration Irregularities
  • Voters' Rights
Country
United States of America
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Jun 25, 2013
Judgment

Abbott v. Perez

Document contents
anchored in Nueces County (home to Corpus Christi) and follows the Gulf of Mexico to the northeast before taking a turn inland to the northwest in the
Question Presented
Whether the 2013 Texas congressional and state House redistricting plans violated the Equal Protection Clause (racial gerrymandering), Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (vote dilution), and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments (intentional discrimination) — and specifically whether the district court erred by finding that the 2011 discriminatory intent "carried over" into the 2013 plans enacted by the Legislature; holding that certain districts were racial gerrymanders where race was the predominant factor; finding Section 2 vote dilution in certain districts where plaintiffs could not demonstrate that an additional compact minority opportunity district was possible; and applying the wrong legal standard in distinguishing between racial motivation and partisan motivation in redistricting.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Electoral Maps and Districting
  • Voters' Rights
Country
United States of America
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Jun 25, 2018
Judgment

Baker v. Carr

Document contents
friendly foreign governments. Compare Ex parte Peru, 318 U. S. 578, with Mexico v. Hoffman, 324 U. S. 30, 34-35. Dates of duration of hostilities: Though
Question Presented
Whether a claim alleging that a state's legislative apportionment scheme violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment — by diluting the voting power of citizens in overpopulated districts — presents a justiciable controversy or is a non-justiciable "political question" that federal courts lack authority to adjudicate. This issue required the Court to revisit and overturn the precedent of Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946), which had held that federal courts should not intervene in reapportionment disputes.
Legal Issue(s)
  • Electoral Maps and Districting
  • Voters' Rights
Country
United States of America
Language of Decision
  • English
Date of decision
Mar 26, 1962
Judgment

Elections on Trial: The Effective Management of Election Disputes and Violations

Description
Drawing on comparative examples across six countries (Mexico, Tunisia, Kenya, Macedonia, Kosovo and the
Preview
Preview
Legal Issue and/or Topic
  • Election Dispute Resolution
Language
  • English
Country
Item does not have this property
Resources

GUARDE: Directrices para la comprension y resolucion de conflictos electorales

Document contents
]  y   parlamentarias  de  México  50  (2006)  [en  lo  sucesivo,    el  informe  de  México],   http://aceproject.org/regionsen/countries-­‐and-­‐territories/MX/reports/mexico-­‐presIdential-­‐and-­‐parliamentary-­‐
Preview
Preview
Legal Issue and/or Topic
  • Election Dispute Resolution
Language
  • Spanish
Country
Item does not have this property
Resources

Mediation and Post Election Litigation: A Way Forward

Document contents
(1980) (any elector can contest results); N.M. STAT. ANN. §1-14-1 (2004) (New Mexico statute allows a candidate to contest the results of an election in court)
Preview
Preview
Legal Issue and/or Topic
  • Election Dispute Resolution
Language
  • English
Country
Item does not have this property
Resources

Access to Justice and Electoral Integrity: A policy brief of the Electoral Integrity Initiative

Document contents
have facilitated democratic development and strengthened electoral justice institutions in Mexico are closely linked to the dialogue between national and international instances.
Preview
Preview
Legal Issue and/or Topic
  • Legal Frameworks
Language
  • English
Country
Item does not have this property
Resources

GUARDE: Guidelines for Understanding, Adjudicating, and Resolving Disputes in Elections

Document contents
Mission, Mexico PresIdential and Parliamentary Elections Final Report 50 (2006) [hereinafter E.U. Mexico Report], available at http://aceproject.org/regionsen/countries-and-territories/MX/reports/mexico-presIden
Preview
Preview
Legal Issue and/or Topic
  • Election Dispute Resolution
Language
  • English
Country
Item does not have this property
Resources

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Document contents
MAURITANIA: POUR LA MAURITANIE: 3a POR MAURITAMA: FOR MEXICO: POUR LE MEXIQUE: S: PS If: 3a MeKCHicy: POR MEXICO: FOR MONACO: POUR MONACO: 3a POR MONACO:
Preview
Preview
Legal Issue and/or Topic
  • International Treaty
Language
  • English
Country
Item does not have this property
Resources

ACHPR Tanganyika Law Society v. Tanzania

Document contents
decision in the Inter – American Court of Human Rights Castañeda Gutman v Mexico, Judgment of 6 August 2008 Series C No 184 to the effect that
Preview
Preview
Legal Issue and/or Topic
  • Regional Jurisprudence
  • Violation of an International Treaty
Language
  • English
Country
Item does not have this property
Resources

30 shown of 48 entities

30 more 300 more

  • Uwazi is developed by Human Rights Information and Documentation Systems

  •  
  • Election Judgments - IFES
  •  
  • Library
  • Login