analysed the evidence on record and came to a correct finding. Counsel for the appellants raised several questions about the respondent’s evidence concerning the issues of filling Declaration of Results Forms before the end of the polling process, and the chasing away of the respondent’s agents. According to Mr. Lukwago, counsel do not point out the faults in the trial judge’s findings on the issue. In his view, the trial judge properly analysed the evidence on record from page 53 to 57 of the judgment and came to a correct finding. Counsel for the appellants also assert that the respondent’s complaints in paragraph II of her affidavit that the 1st appellant’s agents used Declaration of Results Forms which were fake because they do not show serial numbers. That the respondent does not contest the results but only questions the Declaration of Results Forms because they do not show serial numbers. Mr. Lukwago replied that this argument is also redundant because it does not point to a particular fault in the findings of the judge. In his view, counsel are silent on the validity of such Declaration of Results Forms without serial numbers. Sonde Polling Station According to Mr. Lukwago, counsel for the appellants do not specifically point out the faults in the trial judge’s findings about the electoral fraud at this polling station save for the fallacious contention that if the respondent wanted to “verify the information” given by Mutesasira Mesach, the presiding officer, she should have applied to open the ballot boxes of the various polling stations; and that the trial judge should have rejected the affidavit of Nsumba Kefa. Mr. Lukwago submitted that the trial judge properly evaluated the evidence on record and arrived at the following findings of fact at pages 67-70 of the judgment, which counsel for the appellants could not fault: i) That there was no Declaration of Results Form filled at Sonde polling station and therefore, no copy was sealed in the box. ii) That the results were filled on five pieces of paper from an exercise book which indicated that the respondent polled 366 and 2nd