disclosed and statement that they were voters. It is also contended that there were contradictions as to who received the money. Mugambwa Hamuzah said it was one Godfrey Balikuddembe, the agent of the 2nd appellant. Asadi Ddembe said it was NRM Chairman, Katuuka, who received the money. In such circumstances, it was contended for the appellants that the incident was not proved to the satisfaction of the court. 3. Bribery at Nasimanya Village Affidavit of John Ochieng alleged that at Wakiso village while campaigning, the 2nd appellant openly gave 100,000/= to a group of people to vote for him. Sowedi Lwanga, campaign manager for the respondent confessed to have received the alleged money. The 2nd respondent and one Kakande, in their affidavits denied the allegation. The appellants contend that the incident was not proved. 4. Bribery at Kitega village Affidavits of Muwada Walusimbi and that of Bengo George, allege the 2nd appellant gave gifts to leaders and bataka of the area while asking them to vote for him. Both witnesses also received gifts and their photographs were taken while the 2nd appellant was addressing the rally. It is the contention of the appellants that there was no campaign rally on that day but a social gathering. The 2nd appellant explained the circumstances under which the picture was taken and he even produced its original negative. The appellants further contend that it was not proved that the 2nd appellant gave gifts to leaders and Bataka who were voters. The appellants pointed out that with modern technologies, it is possible to combine two pictures or parts thereof into one. In the circumstances, this incident was also not proved to the satisfaction of the court. 5. Bribery at Kiwalu village The affidavit of Kayondo Badru, a D.P Chairman of the village, the party under which the respondent contested, alleges that the 2nd appellant gave