Previous 83 / 115 Next

341 Del siete al veinticinco de marzo de esta anualidad, las coaliciones y los partidos políticos presentaron ante el Instituto Electoral local sus solicitudes de registro de candidaturas a integrantes de los ayuntamientos que se rigen por el sistema de partidos políticos. 342 El siete de abril del dos mil dieciocho, se notificaron las prevenciones y vistas respectivas, requiriéndole a las Coaliciones y a los partidos pol��ticos, para que dentro del plazo de cinco días contados a partir de las notificaciones correspondientes, subsanaran los requisitos omitidos referentes a la elegibilidad de las candidaturas, así como la paridad de género en sus vertientes horizontal, vertical y competitividad, presentando y rectificando, en su caso, la documentación atinente. 343 Los días diez, once y doce de abril del dos mil dieciocho, las referidas coaliciones y Partidos Políticos, desahogaron los requerimientos mencionados, realizando las modificaciones que estimaron pertinentes para subsanar las omisiones e irregularidades que les fueron señaladas. 344 En lo que al caso interesa, la autoridad administrativa electoral local consideró que, respecto de las candidaturas a la primera concejalía de los distintos ayuntamientos, las solicitudes presentadas cumplían con la paridad de género en sus dimensiones horizontal y transversal, al estimar que se postuló igual número de hombres y mujeres, y que se respetó el factor de competitividad para garantizar, en mayor medida, el acceso de hombres y mujeres en los distintos bloques en que se clasificaron los municipios. 345 Por lo que hace a la coalición integrada por los partidos Acción Nacional, de la Revolución Democrática y Movimiento Ciudadano, la autoridad responsable aprobó los registros a las fórmulas a las primeras concejalías de los ayuntamientos de Cosolapa, San Pedro Ixcatlán, San José Chiltepec, San Antonio Castillo Velasco, Santiago Laollaga, y San Juan Bautista lo de Soto, de Luis Armando Martínez Morales, y Lennin Morales Palma; Pedro Osiris Agustín Cruz, y Pedro Agustín Pedro; Roberto Ferrer Espinoza, y Carlos Gómez Gregorio; Alejandro Javier García Jiménez, y Rodrigo Abdías Córdova Sánchez; Carlos Ceballos Rueda, y Carlos Arturo Betanzos Villalobos, así como Alfredo Vicente Queda Serrano, y Alejandro Guzmán Liborio, respectivamente. Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Mexico SUP JDC 304 2018

Judgment

Question Presented: The High Chamber of the confirmed the validity of the candidacy of two transgender people (muxes in the state of Oaxaca) to occupy public posts reserved for women and revoked the registration of 15 male candidates.

Alleged Acts: On April, 2018, the Institute for Elections and Citizen Participation of Oaxaca (IEEPCO) approved to register 19 people who were self-identified as muxes or transgender, as female candidates for legislative and municipal offices within the gender quotas for women . However, the muxe community of Oaxaca considered that, out of the 19 candidacies, 17 of them were fraudulent since they were only pretending to be transgender. Based on these arguments, members of the muxe community filed a complaint with IEEPCO, against these 17 candidacies. The IEEPCO analyzed the arguments of the claim and, after obtaining some evidence on the gender identity with which these 17 candidates conducted themselves socially, opted to cancel the registration, considering that there were irregularities and that, in its opinion, they were men who had self-identified as transgender women .

Summary: In the ruling SUP-JDC-304/2018 and accumulated dated June 21, 2018, the High Chamber defined two determinant issues: the requirements that the State can demand to any person in order to: 1) prove their gender identity and 2) to access to gender quotas in electoral matters and the measures that the authorities can (and should) adopt to verify the gender identity of a person in order to avoid the fraudulent use of gender quotas. The High Chamber ruled that it is enough to inform the respective authority the gender self-identification with a manifestation that clearly indicates the intent of the person in question. They reached this conclusion for two reasons: due to the application of the principle of progressiveness and to provide the principle of parity or substantive equality a useful and non-discriminatory effect. First, the High Chamber considered that, in accordance with the provisions of articles 1st; 4th; 35th, section II; and, 41th, fourth paragraph of the Constitution, all authorities in Mexico, within the scope of their authority, have the obligation to protect and guarantee human rights, which include legal gender equality, the right to stand for election, and the prohibition of the discrimination of a person due to their gender.

Conclusion: The Electoral Tribunal realized that, as the muxe community had stated, 15 of those 17 candidates had tried to register first as men, but not getting the registration because the male gender quota was already covered, they decided to self-identify as transgender women. For this reason, the High Chamber considered that these 15 applications were contradictory with the second manifestation of self-identification arising from the request made by the IEEPCO. Therefore, independently of the express manifestation of these 15 people self-identifying to the transsexual gender, the High Chamber ordered the cancellation of the registration of these candidacies and ordered to replace them with 15 women.

Legal Issue(s)

Candidate Registration
Gender
Quotas

Region: Americas

Country: Mexico

Language of Decision

Spanish

Court: Electoral Court

Election Type: General

Date of decision: Jun 21, 2018

Geolocation

Latitude: 19.433186441267804

Longitude: -99.13401777615888

: Geolocation

Primary Documents

Mexico- SUP-JDC-304-2018.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Election Judgments - IFES

Select target paragraph3

Mexico SUP JDC 304 2018

Primary Documents

Notifications