51 Section 3.19 of the New Elections Law states that "No Registration Roll may be altered within the thirty (30) days period immediately prior to an election, including Election Day, except upon order of the Honorable Supreme Court of Liberia on the determination of a manifest error." In arguments before us, Appellants attempted to impress upon this Board that recording certain voters' names on what is referred to as an addendum amounts to an alteration of the FRR. We disagree. In the mind of this Board, the recording/writing of the names and other information of a person who is a registered voter but by reason of official assignment is in another location and by procedure is allowed to vote only in the presidential election, or as a result of° a printing error, whose name was not printed on the FRR for a particular polling place, does not constitute alteration. To "alter" means to add or remove. Additionally, we note that Section 3.7 of the New Elections Law states that "No registration roll or other election shall be invalidated on the ground that it is not printed or because of any error made in the copying or printing thereof." Accordingly, the fact that a voter's particulars did not appear on the FRR will not be ground to invalidate any document or results concerning the October 10, 2017 elections. Accordingly, we hold that the Hearing Officer did not err. APPELLANTS' ALLEGATION CONCERNING BALLOT BURIED IN GRAND GEDEH As to Appellants' allegation that ballot papers were discovered buried, in Grand Gedeh county and turned over to a police officer, witness Lighe testified that same were "Know Your Candidate',' posters that were altered and used in the process, and that the LNP in Grand Gedeh investigated this matter and turned the said "Know Your Candidates" posters to the NEC. The record shows that Appellants did not rebut this testimony. APPELLANTS' ALLEGATION CONCERNING 1109 VOTES As to Appellants' allegation that the CDC ticket was given 1109 votes at the Tokpaipolu Public School, polling place in District #6, polling place #1 in Bong. County, in excess of the required registered voters at said polling place, witness Lighe stated that it was an inadvertence, on the part of the Presiding Officer, but same was corrected and that only 110 votes were processed as cast for the CDC ticket. The corrected "record of count" signed the parties was testified to and admitted into evidence. For the benefit of this decision, we herein produce the original record of the count: As can be seen from the "record of the count" on which the votes each candidate received at the said polling place were recorded, the total number of votes cast there was 270, out of which 256 votes were recorded as valid and 14 votes as invalid. The CDC ticket received 110 votes; a combined total of 146 votes were received by other candidates. 110 plus 146, equals 256. Also, the above "record of the count" makes it clear that a red mark was placed on the number 9 that appears to the right of the 110 votes received by the CDC ticket, and same had no impact on any candidate's vote. The Honorable Supreme Court has defined fraud as the employment of trick, artifice or deception to cheat or mislead another, and that it is not sufficient to merely allege fraud as a basis for relief; it must be established by proof. For reliance, see: Kontar v. Mouwaffak, 17 LLR 446; Monrovia Construction Corporation v. Wazami, 23 LLR 58; Scaf v. Ricketts, 28 LLR 263; Francis v. The Mesurado Fishing Company, Ltd., 20 LLR 542; Massaquoi v. Massaquoi, 35 LLR 508.