50 Marsano and Rey Terry. These expenses totaled US$50,400.00 (fifty thousand four hundred United States dollars); and ii. In 1999 and 2000, he traveled twice to San José, Costa Rica, in order to collaborate with the Inter-American Commission in the preparation of this case before the Inter-American Court; in this regard, he paid travel, accommodation and alimentation expenses amounting to US$3,200.00 (three thousand two hundred United States dollars). c. With regard to Guillermo Rey Terry: He employed the services of a lawyer to provide advisory services in the domestic proceeding to obtain “recognition of his right to collect remuneration for the time that he was separated from his functions”; this generated expenses amounting to US$31,213.45 (thirty-one thousand two hundred and thirteen United States dollars and fortyfive cents). The State’s arguments 116. Peru did not submit any arguments on this matter, since it did not appear before the Court in the case sub judice (supra 58-62). * * * The Court’s considerations 117. Article 63(1) of the American Convention established that: If the Court finds that there has been a violation of a right or freedom protected by this Convention, the Court shall rule that the injured party be ensured the enjoyment of his right or freedom that was violated. It shall also rule, if appropriate, that the consequences of the measure or situation that constituted the breach of such right or freedom be remedied and that fair compensation be paid to the injured party. 118. In its jurisprudence, this Court has reiterated that it is a principle of international law that any violation of an international obligation that produces a damage entails the obligation to repair it appropriately67. 119. The reparation of the damage caused by the violation of an international obligation requires full restitution (restitutio in integrum), which consists in reestablishing the previous situation, and repairing the consequences of the violation, and also payment of compensation for the damages caused. 67 Cf. Suárez Rosero case. Reparations (Article 63.1, American Convention on Human Rights). Judgment of January 20, 1999. Series C No. 44, para. 40. In the same way, Cf. Factory at Chorzów, Jurisdiction, Judgment No. 8, 1927, P.C.I.J., Series A, No. 9, page 21; and Factory at Chorzów, Merits, Judgment No. 13, 1928, P.C.I.J., Series A, No. 17, page 29; Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1949, page 184.