Table 4.2.1.6. An overview of the evaluation of recommendations relevant to the administration of justice process issued after the 2016 and 2017 elections, election day field, according to ODIHR80 Election cycle Recommendation Priority / Other 2016 #21 Authorities could consider reviewing voting screen design and polling station layout, to ensure the secrecy of the vote and consider requiring badges for all PB members. Other 2016 #22 Procedures governing the inspection of materials should be clearly established allowing for a meaningful and uniform review. Measures should be taken to secure election materials during inspection Other 2016 #23 To enhance the transparency and integrity of the electoral process, the law should prescribe a detailed tabulation process that is conducted by the election administration. Other 2016 #24 Measures should be taken to enhance the accuracy of PBs’ work including on counting and drafting of PB protocols. Proportionate sanctions should be imposed for irregularities. Other 2017 #20 Additional efforts should be made by the REC to ensure the secrecy of the vote. This should be explicitly addressed during Other training, with clear and uniform instructions provided. Status * * Not implemented Partially implemented Mostly implemented Fully implemented Not evaluated Table 4.2.1.7. An overview of the evaluation of recommendations relevant to the administration of justice process issued after the 2016 and 2017 elections, media field, according to ODIHR81 Election cycle Recommendation Priority / Other 2016 #6 Consideration should be given to clarify the REM’s competences in investigating and sanctioning breaches of legislation in a timely manner. In addition, the REM should act upon its own initiative, based on systematic monitoring election coverage and compliance with established regulations. Priority Status * Final reports for 2016 and 2017: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/0/e/259021.pdf and https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/c/6/330296.pdf. Evaluation status of each recommendation is available at: https://paragraph25.odihr.pl/home-page-countries/serbia/ 81 Final reports for 2016 and 2017: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/0/e/259021.pdf and https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/c/6/330296.pdf. Evaluation status of each recommendation is available at: https://paragraph25.odihr.pl/home-page-countries/serbia/ 80 49