Apart from activities prohibited by the Criminal Code and other regulations governing election processes, there is a set of activities in practice that are not prohibited and are often interpreted in public as illegal due to the circumstances under which they are taking place. This primarily implies the so-called safe vote databases (capillary votes), namely the databases of supporters/members that participants in the elections make to contact them more often and motivate them to go to the polls. This is closely linked to contacting supporters and members by telephone or in some other way and the door-to-door campaign – as basic and direct ways of contacting voters and supporters to promote policies, programs and ideas and to attract voters to vote for these programs. However, it is particularly important to point out here that there are many indications that these activities often cross the limit of what is allowed and become illegal. This mostly involves the following cases: 1) Data collection and contacting voters based on copies of voter lists, i. e. on the basis of parallel voter records. the legislative framework prohibits the possession of copies of voter lists, as the legally binding Instructions for implementing the Law on the Single Electoral Register104 stipulate that the electoral register and voter lists are used exclusively for the purpose of conducting elections or a referendum. In addition to this provision, possession of parts of the electoral register is contrary to regulations governing personal data protection. 2) Unlawful or unauthorized collection of personal data without the express consent of the citizens, contrary to regulations governing personal data protection. This data collection may be the result of purchasing databases from companies or legal entities that have collected personal data for other purposes but may also be a result of misuse of administrative resources. 3) Re-contacting voters who requested that their data be deleted from the database, or those voters who have not given their consent to be contacted; 4) The collection of safe votes in public enterprises and the misuse of other administrative resources or positions. Given the different forms and scope of the activities described in this and previous chapters, we examined to what extent have citizens been exposed to authorized and unauthorized activities of political parties and movements during the June 2020 elections, or how they perceived the pressures and abuses of voting rights. In addition to perception and exposure to pressures, we also investigated the citizens' relationship to bodies responsible for the administration of justice. 4.3.10.1. Citizens' exposure to party activities during the June 2020 elections Firstly, we measured the citizens’ exposure to (1) telephone calls from a political party; (2) telephone calls during election day, insisting that they go to the polls; (3) visits by party activists in their home; (4) visits by party activists in their workplace and (5) stopping by party activists in the Instructions for the implementation of the Law on the Single Electoral Register, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 15/2012, 88/2018 and 67/2020, Chapter III: The manner of using the electoral register, excerpts from the electoral register (voter lists) and insight into the voter register. 104 70