…were you asked to photograph the ballot to confirm who you voted for 99.5 0.4 0.1 0 …were you asked to vote publicly and thus confirm who you supported 99 0.5 0.3 0.2 …were you asked to get people close to you (relatives, friends...) to vote for a political party, i.e., to be a ‘sure vote’ 92.2 2.2 4.6 1 Chart 4.3.10.2.1. Respondent exposure to pressures (the answers ‘one + several times’ are presented in summary), in % …promised improvements for your/their community or neighbourhood (sewerage, road repairs, street lighting,… 11.5 …asked to persuade people in your/their immediate social circle (family members, friends, etc.) to be ‘safe votes’ for a… 6.8 …promised employment for yourself or a person close to you/them if you/they voted for a specific political party 6.5 …promised remuneration in food or fuel or other non-cash reward in exchange for voting for a specific political party 4.2 …promised remuneration in cash in exchange for voting for a specific political party 3 …threatened with losing employment unless you/they voted for a specific political party …asked to vote publicly as proof of who you/they voted for …asked to take a picture of your/their ballot paper as proof of who you/they voted for …threatened with physical assault unless you/they voted for a specific political party 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.2 A more detailed analysis of the socio-demographic profile of citizens who were more frequently subject to illicit pressures showed no relevant statistical differences compared to the majority of the criteria. Exceptions are respondents aged 30 to 39 who predominantly confirmed that they were asked to vote publicly or were promised financial compensation in exchange for their vote, as well as subjects who graduated/did not graduate from primary school, who predominantly said they were promised non-pecuniary compensation in exchange for their vote. As with the previous set of claims, it can also be seen here that those respondents who believe Serbia is moving in a bad direction or are undecided about this issue are more often or more strongly exposed to pressures. In addition, a more detailed analysis shows a rule (with occasional exceptions) that the above-average exposure to pressures is shown by respondents who assess their quality of life as intolerable or hardly 76